Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 4-33-6-17 (2026)

Nature of license

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 17. A license to operate an excursion gaming boat:

(1) is a revocable privilege granted by the state; and

(2) is not a property right.

As added by P.L.277-1993(ss), SEC.124.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2007–2009 · leading case: City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc., 878 N.E.2d 358 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc., 878 N.E.2d 358 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 8× “As such, there cannot be any reasonable expectation that the agreement would be effective beyond the original five-year term, as the majority concludes, especially where the license was not a property right ( Ind. Code § 4-33-6-17 (2) (1993) (ss)), was subject to revocation by…”
City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc., 908 N.E.2d 611 (Ind. 2009). · cites it 2× “" Ind.Code § 4-33-6-17 (2008). The Commission may renew an existing license.”
Ind. Code § 4-33-6-17(1): 1 case
City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc., 878 N.E.2d 358 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). “As such, there cannot be any reasonable expectation that the agreement would be effective beyond the original five-year term, as the majority concludes, especially where the license was not a property right ( Ind. Code § 4-33-6-17 (2) (1993) (ss)), was subject to revocation by…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.