Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 5-23-1-1 (2026)

Applicability of article

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 1. This article applies to the following:

(1) The state.

(2) A political subdivision in a county containing a consolidated city.

(3) A political subdivision in a county where:

(A) the legislative body of the political subdivision; or

(B) if the political subdivision does not have a legislative body, the fiscal body of the political subdivision;

adopts the provisions of this article by resolution or ordinance.

As added by P.L.49-1997, SEC.34.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2013–2015 · leading case: Julie Kitchell v. Ted Franklin, as the Mayor of the City of Logansport, & the Common Council of the City of Logansport, 997 N.E.2d 1020 (Ind. 2013).
Julie Kitchell v. Ted Franklin, as the Mayor of the City of Logansport, & the Common Council of the City of Logansport, 997 N.E.2d 1020 (Ind. 2013). · cites it 11× “See Ind.Code §§ 5-23-1-1 through 5-23-7-2. Among other things the Act “permits agreements between a governmental body and a private operator to construct, operate, and maintain a public facility.”
Julie Kitchell v. Ted Franklin, as the Mayor of the City of Logansport, & The Common Council of the City of Logansport, 26 N.E.3d 1050 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 7× “To that end, the City began to explore the possibility of entering *1053 into a public-private partnership under Indiana’s Public-Private Agreements Act (the PPA Act), Indiana Code sections 5-23-1-1 through 5-23-7-2, with a provider that could “construct, operate, and maintain a…”
Ind. Code § 5-23-1-1(3): 1 case
Julie Kitchell v. Ted Franklin, as the Mayor of the City of Logansport, & the Common Council of the City of Logansport, 997 N.E.2d 1020 (Ind. 2013). “See Ind.Code §§ 5-23-1-1 through 5-23-7-2. Among other things the Act “permits agreements between a governmental body and a private operator to construct, operate, and maintain a public facility.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.