Ind. Code » Title 9
Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 9-30-10-15 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Pre-1991 Recodification Citation: 9-12-2-11.]

As added by P.L.2-1991, SEC.18. Amended by P.L.101-1997, SEC.3; P.L.28-2010, SEC.8; P.L.125-2012, SEC.357; P.L.85-2013, SEC.105. Repealed by P.L.217-2014, SEC.142.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2008–2015 · leading case: State v. Jackson, 889 N.E.2d 819 (Ind. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Jackson, 889 N.E.2d 819 (Ind. 2008). · cites it 4× “, violating conditions of a restricted license issued under Ind.Code § 9-30-10-15(d). [4] This conclusion does not conflict with State v.”
Timothy Ladana Hazelwood v. State of Indiana, 3 N.E.3d 39 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “" IC. § 9-30-10-15(b)(2). Section 17 of chapter 9-30-10 defines the crime of operating a motor vehicle while privileges are forfeited for life, and Hazelwood admits that he was convicted of this offense.”
Keith Bullock, Jr. v. State of Indiana & Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehs. (mem. dec.) (Ind. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 4× “Similarly, Indiana Code section 9-30-10-15 provides that, before a trial court may order rescission of a lifetime suspension order and reinstate a person’s driving privileges, the court must find by clear and convincing evidence several conditions, and again one of these…”
Hazelwood v. State, 24 N.E.3d 39 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 4× “Similarly, Indiana Code section 9-30-10-15 provides that, before a trial court may order rescission of a lifetime suspension order and reinstate a person’s driving privileges, the court must find by clear and convincing evidence several conditions, and again one of these…”
Ind. Code § 9-30-10-15(b)(2): 3 cases
Timothy Ladana Hazelwood v. State of Indiana, 3 N.E.3d 39 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). “" IC. § 9-30-10-15(b)(2). Section 17 of chapter 9-30-10 defines the crime of operating a motor vehicle while privileges are forfeited for life, and Hazelwood admits that he was convicted of this offense.”
Keith Bullock, Jr. v. State of Indiana & Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehs. (mem. dec.) (Ind. Ct. App. 2015). “Similarly, Indiana Code section 9-30-10-15 provides that, before a trial court may order rescission of a lifetime suspension order and reinstate a person’s driving privileges, the court must find by clear and convincing evidence several conditions, and again one of these…”
Hazelwood v. State, 24 N.E.3d 39 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). “Similarly, Indiana Code section 9-30-10-15 provides that, before a trial court may order rescission of a lifetime suspension order and reinstate a person’s driving privileges, the court must find by clear and convincing evidence several conditions, and again one of these…”
Ind. Code § 9-30-10-15(d): 1 case
State v. Jackson, 889 N.E.2d 819 (Ind. 2008). “, violating conditions of a restricted license issued under Ind.Code § 9-30-10-15(d). [4] This conclusion does not conflict with State v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.