Iowa Code
Iowa Code § 10.2 (2026)
Interests described
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
As used in this chapter, all of the following apply:
1. A person holds an interest in agricultural land if the person either directly or indirectly owns or leases the agricultural land in this state.
2. A person holds an interest in a farmers entity if the person holds an interest as any of the following:
a. A shareholder of a networking farmers corporation.
b. A member of a networking farmers limited liability company.
c. A member of a farmers cooperative association.
d. A member of a farmers cooperative limited liability company. 98 Acts, ch 1110, §102, 301; 2020 Acts, ch 1063, §7\n\nTue Dec 09 22:33:50 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 10 (27, 0) §10.3, AGRICULTURAL LANDHOLDING RESTRICTIONS 4\n\n SUBCHAPTER II RESTRICTIONS\n\n PART 1 NETWORKING FARMERS CORPORATIONS \n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1966–2026 · leading case: Iowa Power & Light Co. v. Abild Constr. Co., 144 N.W.2d 303 (Iowa 1966).
Iowa Power & Light Co. v. Abild Constr. Co., 144 N.W.2d 303 (Iowa 1966). “I, § 10.2, p. 718. Ipalco recognizes we have applied the common liability rule as a basis for recovery-over in the form of contribution but urges us to abandon the rule and allow equitable contribution between joint tort-feasors on proof of concurrent negligence and proximate…”
Bearbower v. Merry, 266 N.W.2d 128 (Iowa 1978). “Clark, Law of Domestic Relations, § 10.2, p. 267 (1968): *131 "The reasons underlying abolition of alienation of affections are many and persuasive.”
Cerro Gordo Cnty. v. Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 395 N.W.2d 672 (Iowa Ct. App. 1986). “The union alleged in its complaint the county had violated PERA Section 10.2 by terminating Jones, Smail and Warden for union activity.”
Fundermann v. Mickelson, 304 N.W.2d 790 (Iowa 1981). “Clark, Law of Domestic Relations, § 10.2 at 267 (1968). II. There is an unmistakable trend away from allowing alienation suits.”
Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Petersen, 679 N.W.2d 571 (Iowa 2004). “Fourth, the enactment of uninsured motorist insurance statutes throughout the country, which mandate either that the insurance be offered to all motor vehicle insurance purchasers or included in all motor vehicle insurance policies, reflects the importance attached to providing…”
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Bd. v. Howe, 706 N.W.2d 360 (Iowa 2005). “” 1 The Law of Lawyering § 10.2, at 10-7; see also id. § 11.19, at 11-59 (discussing interests of tribunal and public that are adversely affected by conflicted representation in litigation).”
Peters v. Lyons, 168 N.W.2d 759 (Iowa 1969). “I, section 10.2, page 724. To the injured plaintiff, it makes no difference how the dog got loose.”
Shonka v. Campbell, 152 N.W.2d 242 (Iowa 1967). “Harper and James, The Law of Torts, section 10.2, page 718, cited in Bedell v.”
Bottoms v. Stapleton, 706 N.W.2d 411 (Iowa 2005). “William Hodes, The Law of Lawyering § 10.2, at 10-10 (3d ed. 2004 Supp.) (stating “policymaking with respect to conflicts of interest regulation must take account of the opportunities for manipulation and tactical infighting”) [hereinafter “The Law of Lawyering ”].”
Duck Creek Tire Serv., Inc., an Iowa Corp., & Midwest Mexican Connection, LTD., an Iowa Corp. v. Goodyear Corners, L.C., 796 N.W.2d 886 (Iowa 2011). “1 and recover damages to the extent prescribed in § 10.2. Id. § 4.3, at 140. This rule developed from the common law view, which held the eviction of a tenant by the holder of a paramount title is attributable to the tenant’s landlord and constitutes a breach of the covenant of…”
In the Matter of Douglas A. KRULL, Jud. Magistrate, 860 N.W.2d 38 (Iowa 2015). “, The Law of Lawyering § 10.2, at 10-7 (3d ed.2004 Supp.))). Magistrate Krull was required to recuse himself from acting on the search warrant.”
State v. Miner, 331 N.W.2d 683 (Iowa 1983). “Code [07, D] § 10.2(4)(b)(2). The practical result is that brokering of used cars at retail in Iowa is not allowed.”
— Iowa Code § 10.2(4)(b)(2) — 1 case
State v. Miner, 331 N.W.2d 683 (Iowa 1983). “Code [07, D] § 10.2(4)(b)(2). The practical result is that brokering of used cars at retail in Iowa is not allowed.”
— Iowa Code § 10.2(C) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 10.2(C)(2) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 10.2(D)(1) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 10.2(E)(1) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 10.2(d) — 1 case
State of Iowa v. Jasmaine R. Warren (Iowa Ct. App. 2020).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.