1. Grievances.
a. An employee, except an employee covered by a collective bargaining agreement which
provides otherwise, who has exhausted the available agency steps in the uniform grievance
procedure provided for in the department rules may, within seven calendar days following the
date a decision was received or should have been received at the second step of the grievance
procedure, file the grievance at the third step with the director. The director shall respond
within thirty calendar days following receipt of the third step grievance.
b. If not satisfied, the employee may, within thirty calendar days following the director’s
response, file an appeal with the employment appeal board. The hearing shall be conducted
in accordance with the rules of the employment appeal board and the Iowa administrative
procedure Act, chapter 17A. Decisions rendered shall be based upon a standard of
substantial compliance with this subchapter and the rules of the department. Decisions by
the employment appeal board constitute final agency action.
c. For purposes of this subsection, “uniform grievance procedure” does not include
procedures for discipline and discharge.
2. Discipline resolution.
a. A merit system employee, except an employee covered by a collective bargaining
agreement, who is discharged, suspended, demoted, or otherwise receives a reduction in
pay, except during the employee’s probationary period, may bypass steps one and two of the
grievance procedure and appeal the disciplinary action to the director within seven calendar\n\nTue Dec 09 22:34:30 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 8A (159, 2)
55 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, §8A.417\n\ndays following the effective date of the action. The director shall respond within thirty
calendar days following receipt of the appeal.
b. If not satisfied, the employee may, within thirty calendar days following the director’s
response, file an appeal with the employment appeal board. The employee has the right to
a hearing closed to the public, unless a public hearing is requested by the employee. The
hearing shall otherwise be conducted in accordance with the rules of the employment appeal
board and the Iowa administrative procedure Act, chapter 17A. If the employment appeal
board finds that the action taken by the appointing authority was for political, religious, racial,
national origin, sex, age, or other reasons not constituting just cause, the employee may be
reinstated without loss of pay or benefits for the elapsed period, or the employment appeal
board may provide other appropriate remedies. Decisions by the employment appeal board
constitute final agency action.
2003 Acts, ch 145, §63; 2007 Acts, ch 22, §3; 2008 Acts, ch 1032, §201; 2016 Acts, ch 1059,
§2, 3; 2023 Acts, ch 19, §1712, 1713; 2024 Acts, ch 1170, §128, 129
Referred to in §20.6, 235A.15
\n
Notes of Decisions
Derek Krogman v. Iowa Pub. Emp. Relations Bd. (Iowa Ct. App. 2023).
· cites it 8× “See Iowa Code § 8A.415 (2018). Following a hearing, an administrative law judge (ALJ) determined the State demonstrated just cause to terminate Krogman’s employment.”
Sandry v. Iowa Pub. Emp. Relations Bd. (Iowa Ct. App. 2024).
· cites it 6× “See Iowa Code § 8A.415(2) (2010). Part of Sandry’s duties in that role required issuing licenses, conducting driving tests, collecting payments for fines and fees, and maintaining a cash till at her workstation.”
Troy Kleppe v. Fort Dodge Police Dep't & City of Fort Dodge, Iowa (Iowa Ct. App. 2020).
· cites it 3× “There, our supreme court found Iowa Code section 8A.415, which provided an administrative grievance procedure for department of administrative services employees, did not expressly require exhaustion of administrative remedies before filing a civil action under Iowa Code section…”
Bowman v. State (Iowa Ct. App. 2023).
· cites it 2× “See Iowa Code § 8A.415(2) (2019). Next Bowman petitioned for judicial review, naming the State, DOT, DAS, PERB, and the Attorney General1 as defendants.”
Emilio M. Puente v. City of Iowa City (Iowa Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 2× “Although the plaintiff in that case sued for wrongful termination in violation of public policy—“a common law claim not raised in Van Baale”—the court found that theory foreclosed by the grievance and discipline-resolution procedures under Iowa Code section 8A.415. Id. An appeal…”
— Iowa Code § 8A.415(1) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 8A.415(1)(a) — 1 case
Troy Kleppe v. Fort Dodge Police Dep't & City of Fort Dodge, Iowa (Iowa Ct. App. 2020).
“There, our supreme court found Iowa Code section 8A.415, which provided an administrative grievance procedure for department of administrative services employees, did not expressly require exhaustion of administrative remedies before filing a civil action under Iowa Code section…”
— Iowa Code § 8A.415(1)(b) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 8A.415(2) — 3 cases
Sandry v. Iowa Pub. Emp. Relations Bd. (Iowa Ct. App. 2024).
“See Iowa Code § 8A.415(2) (2010). Part of Sandry’s duties in that role required issuing licenses, conducting driving tests, collecting payments for fines and fees, and maintaining a cash till at her workstation.”
Bowman v. State (Iowa Ct. App. 2023).
“See Iowa Code § 8A.415(2) (2019). Next Bowman petitioned for judicial review, naming the State, DOT, DAS, PERB, and the Attorney General1 as defendants.”
— Iowa Code § 8A.415(2)(b) — 2 cases
Derek Krogman v. Iowa Pub. Emp. Relations Bd. (Iowa Ct. App. 2023).
“See Iowa Code § 8A.415 (2018). Following a hearing, an administrative law judge (ALJ) determined the State demonstrated just cause to terminate Krogman’s employment.”
Sandry v. Iowa Pub. Emp. Relations Bd. (Iowa Ct. App. 2024).
“See Iowa Code § 8A.415(2) (2010). Part of Sandry’s duties in that role required issuing licenses, conducting driving tests, collecting payments for fines and fees, and maintaining a cash till at her workstation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.