K.S.A. » Chapter 12
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 12-6a07 (2026)

Apportionment of cost of improvement

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

12-6a07. Apportionment of cost of improvement. (a) The city may pay such portion of the cost of the improvement as the governing body may determine, but not more than ninety-five percent (95%) of the total cost thereof. The share of the cost to be paid by the city at large shall be paid in the manner provided by K.S.A. 12-6a14.

(b) If any property deemed benefited shall by reason of any provision of law be exempt from payment of special assessments therefor, such assessment shall, nevertheless, be computed and shall be paid by the city at large.

History: L. 1957, ch. 99, § 7; L. 1968, ch. 305, § 1; L. 1978, ch. 58, § 1; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1986–1998 · leading case: Davis v. City of Leawood, 893 P.2d 233 (Kan. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Davis v. City of Leawood, 893 P.2d 233 (Kan. 1995). · cites it 3× “” Apportionment of improvement costs is the subject of K.S.A. 12-6a07: “(a) The city may pay such portion of the cost of the improvement as the governing body may determine, but not more than ninety-five percent (95%) of the total cost thereof.”
Mallon v. City of Emporia, 726 P.2d 1354 (Kan. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “The landowners cite no cases that require the governing body to adhere to adopted policies when contravention of the policy is not in violation of the state statutes.”
Bauer v. City of Olathe, 894 P.2d 823 (Kan. 1995). “” K.S.A. 12-6a07 provides: “(a) The city may pay such portion of the cost of the improvement as the governing body may determine, but not more than ninety-five percent (95%) of the total cost thereof.”
Garvey Elevators, Inc. v. City of Wichita, 714 P.2d 956 (Kan. 1986). · cites it 4× “K.S.A. 12-6a07 provides: “(a) The city may pay such portion of the cost of the improvement as the governing body may determine, but not more than ninety-five percent (95%) of the total cost thereof.”
Attorney Gen. Opinion No. (Kan. Att'y Gen. 1998). “K.S.A. 12-6a07. The rest of the cost is spread among the properties that make up the district and the governing body is obligated to assess such properties by imposing substantially equal burdens or shares of the cost of the improvement upon each property.”
K.S.A. § 12-6a07(a): 1 case
Davis v. City of Leawood, 893 P.2d 233 (Kan. 1995). “” Apportionment of improvement costs is the subject of K.S.A. 12-6a07: “(a) The city may pay such portion of the cost of the improvement as the governing body may determine, but not more than ninety-five percent (95%) of the total cost thereof.”
K.S.A. § 12-6a07(b): 1 case
Garvey Elevators, Inc. v. City of Wichita, 714 P.2d 956 (Kan. 1986). “K.S.A. 12-6a07 provides: “(a) The city may pay such portion of the cost of the improvement as the governing body may determine, but not more than ninety-five percent (95%) of the total cost thereof.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.