K.S.A. » Chapter 12
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 12-736 (2026)

Group homes, exclusion of, prohibited; conditions; definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

12-736. Group homes, exclusion of, prohibited; conditions; definitions. (a) It is hereby declared to be the policy of the state of Kansas that persons with a disability shall not be excluded from the benefits of single family residential surroundings by any municipal zoning ordinance, resolution or regulation.

(b) For the purpose of this act:

(1) "Group home" means any dwelling occupied by not more than 10 persons, including eight or fewer persons with a disability who need not be related by blood or marriage and not to exceed two staff residents who need not be related by blood or marriage to each other or to the residents of the home, which dwelling is licensed by a regulatory agency of this state;

(2) "municipality" means any township, city or county located in Kansas;

(3) "disability" means, with respect to a person:

(A) A physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of such person's major life activities;

(B) a record of having such an impairment; or

(C) being regarded as having such an impairment. Such term does not include current, illegal use of or addiction to a controlled substance, as defined in section 102 of the controlled substance act, 21 U.S.C. § 802; and

(4) "licensed provider" means a person or agency who provides mental health services and is licensed by:

(A) The Kansas department for aging and disability services pursuant to K.S.A. 39-2001 et seq. or 65-425 et seq., and amendments thereto; or*

(B) the behavioral sciences regulatory board pursuant to K.S.A. 74-5301 et seq. or 75-5346 et seq., and amendments thereto; or

(C) the state board of healing arts pursuant to K.S.A. 65-2801 et seq., and amendments thereto.

(c) (1) No mentally ill person shall be eligible for placement in a group home unless such person has been evaluated by a licensed provider and such provider determines that the mentally ill person is not dangerous to others and is suitable for group-home placement. A group home shall not be a licensed provider for the purposes of evaluating or approving for placement a mentally ill person in a group home.

(2) No person shall be eligible for placement in a group home if such person is: (A) Assigned to a community corrections program or a diversion program; (B) on parole from a correctional institution or on probation for a felony offense; or (C) in a state mental institution following a finding of mental disease or defect excluding criminal responsibility, pursuant to K.S.A. 22-3221, and amendments thereto, and K.S.A. 21-5209, and amendments thereto.

(d) No person shall be placed in a group home under this act unless such dwelling is licensed as a group home by the Kansas department for aging and disability services or the department of health and environment.

(e) No municipality shall prohibit the location of a group home in any zone or area where single family dwellings are permitted. Any zoning ordinance, resolution or regulation that prohibits the location of a group home in such zone or area or that subjects group homes to regulations not applicable to other single family dwellings in the same zone or area is invalid. Notwithstanding the provisions of this act, group homes shall be subject to all other regulations applicable to other property and buildings located in the zone or area that are imposed by any municipality through zoning ordinance, resolution or regulation, its building regulatory codes, subdivision regulations or other nondiscriminatory regulations.

(f) No person or entity shall contract or enter into a contract, restrictive covenant, equitable servitude or such similar restriction that would restrict group homes or their location in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of subsection (e).

History: L. 1988, ch. 142, § 1; L. 1989, ch. 58, § 1; L. 1991, ch. 63, § 1; L. 1995, ch. 251, § 23; L. 2014, ch. 115, § 5; L. 2018, ch. 71, § 1; L. 2023, ch. 93, § 1; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1999–2006 · leading case: Bd. of Leavenworth Cnty. Comm'rs v. Whitson, 132 P.3d 920 (Kan. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bd. of Leavenworth Cnty. Comm'rs v. Whitson, 132 P.3d 920 (Kan. 2006). · cites it 32× “Despite his reduced risk of reoffending because of his poor health and the structure and safeguards of the planned facility, the district judge implicitly determined that the Board had made a sufficient showing of probability of irreparable injury when he granted the injunction…”
Keys Youth Servs., Inc. v. City of Olathe, Kan., 52 F. Supp. 2d 1284 (D. Kan. 1999). · cites it 24× “, as amended by the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, Kansas law protecting persons with a disability, K.S.A. § 12-736, and it constitutional rights to procedural and substantive due process and equal protection.”
Keys Youth Servs., Inc. v. City of Olathe, Kan., 75 F. Supp. 2d 1235 (D. Kan. 1999). · cites it 26× “, as amended by the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, and Kansas law protecting persons with a disability, K.S.A. § 12-736. 1 This Court previously granted Keys’ motion for summary judgment on its claim that the City violated the FHA by discriminating against potential…”
Keys Youth Servs., Inc. v. City of Olathe, 248 F.3d 1267 (10th Cir. 2001). · cites it 3× “The court noted, however, that “Keys has not clarified how [Olathe’s] refusal to allow ten residents would violate K.S.A. § 12-736” given the particular facts of this case.”
Keys Youth Servs., Inc. v. City of Olathe, Kan., 38 F. Supp. 2d 914 (D. Kan. 1999). · cites it 13× “Based on this position, Keys asserts that K.S.A. § 12-736 authorizes ten persons to occupy a group home in a single family residential setting, notwithstanding local zoning to the contrary.”
K.S.A. § 12-736(a): 1 case
Bd. of Leavenworth Cnty. Comm'rs v. Whitson, 132 P.3d 920 (Kan. 2006). “Despite his reduced risk of reoffending because of his poor health and the structure and safeguards of the planned facility, the district judge implicitly determined that the Board had made a sufficient showing of probability of irreparable injury when he granted the injunction…”
K.S.A. § 12-736(b)(1): 2 cases
Bd. of Leavenworth Cnty. Comm'rs v. Whitson, 132 P.3d 920 (Kan. 2006). “Despite his reduced risk of reoffending because of his poor health and the structure and safeguards of the planned facility, the district judge implicitly determined that the Board had made a sufficient showing of probability of irreparable injury when he granted the injunction…”
Keys Youth Servs., Inc. v. City of Olathe, Kan., 75 F. Supp. 2d 1235 (D. Kan. 1999). “, as amended by the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, and Kansas law protecting persons with a disability, K.S.A. § 12-736. 1 This Court previously granted Keys’ motion for summary judgment on its claim that the City violated the FHA by discriminating against potential…”
K.S.A. § 12-736(b)(3): 1 case
Bd. of Leavenworth Cnty. Comm'rs v. Whitson, 132 P.3d 920 (Kan. 2006). “Despite his reduced risk of reoffending because of his poor health and the structure and safeguards of the planned facility, the district judge implicitly determined that the Board had made a sufficient showing of probability of irreparable injury when he granted the injunction…”
K.S.A. § 12-736(b)(l): 2 cases
Bd. of Leavenworth Cnty. Comm'rs v. Whitson, 132 P.3d 920 (Kan. 2006). “Despite his reduced risk of reoffending because of his poor health and the structure and safeguards of the planned facility, the district judge implicitly determined that the Board had made a sufficient showing of probability of irreparable injury when he granted the injunction…”
Keys Youth Servs., Inc. v. City of Olathe, Kan., 75 F. Supp. 2d 1235 (D. Kan. 1999). “, as amended by the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, and Kansas law protecting persons with a disability, K.S.A. § 12-736. 1 This Court previously granted Keys’ motion for summary judgment on its claim that the City violated the FHA by discriminating against potential…”
K.S.A. § 12-736(c)(1): 1 case
Bd. of Leavenworth Cnty. Comm'rs v. Whitson, 132 P.3d 920 (Kan. 2006). “Despite his reduced risk of reoffending because of his poor health and the structure and safeguards of the planned facility, the district judge implicitly determined that the Board had made a sufficient showing of probability of irreparable injury when he granted the injunction…”
K.S.A. § 12-736(c)(l): 1 case
Bd. of Leavenworth Cnty. Comm'rs v. Whitson, 132 P.3d 920 (Kan. 2006). “Despite his reduced risk of reoffending because of his poor health and the structure and safeguards of the planned facility, the district judge implicitly determined that the Board had made a sufficient showing of probability of irreparable injury when he granted the injunction…”
K.S.A. § 12-736(e): 1 case
Bd. of Leavenworth Cnty. Comm'rs v. Whitson, 132 P.3d 920 (Kan. 2006). “Despite his reduced risk of reoffending because of his poor health and the structure and safeguards of the planned facility, the district judge implicitly determined that the Board had made a sufficient showing of probability of irreparable injury when he granted the injunction…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.