Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 16-1601 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

16-1601. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as the uniform electronic transactions act.

History: L. 2000, ch. 120, § 1; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Cited in case involving statute of fraud where oral agreement recited in court. In re Marriage of Takusagawa, 38 Kan. App. 2d 401, 166 P.3d 440 (2007).


Previous | Next

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2007–2020 · leading case: In Re the Marriage of Takusagawa, 166 P.3d 440 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re the Marriage of Takusagawa, 166 P.3d 440 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007). “First, Kansas’ adoption in 2000 of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA), K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 16-1601 et seq., probably makes Mieko’s in-court statement the legal equivalent of a written signature for purposes of the statute of frauds.”
Sigg v. Coltrane, 253 P.3d 781 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 3× “Is an e-mail sent by the party to be charged sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the statute of frauds? On appeal, Sigg first argues that an e-mail sent by the Coltranes was sufficient to satisfy the statute of frauds.”
Brent D. Benjamin v. Elizabeth D. Walker (W. Va. 2016). “2010); Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 16-1601 to -1620 (2000); Ky.”
Clark v. Am. Multi-Cinema, Inc. (D.S.C. 2020). “See Kan. Stat. Ann. § 16-1601 et seq.; S.C. Code Ann.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.