History:
L. 1957, ch. 145, § 14; L. 1984, ch. 86, § 1; L. 1988, ch. 91, § 1; L. 2003, ch. 117, § 5; Repealed, L. 2004, ch. 154, § 65; July 1, 2005.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Though a claim of immunity may be raised prior to trial by habeas corpus, privilege does not extend to records of collective entity. Karstetter v. Love, 9 Kan. App. 2d 194, 197, 674 P.2d 1066 (1984).
2. Cited; purpose of act explained; sale of "activator kits" constitutes sale of investment contracts (K.S.A. 17-1252(j)). Activator Supply Co. v. Wurth, 239 Kan. 610, 613, 621, 722 P.2d 1081 (1986).
3. Commissioner may subpoena bank records of bank customer with provision that bank not notify customer of subpoena; customer has no reasonable expectation of privacy in bank records. State ex rel. Brant v. Bank of America, 272 Kan. 182, 31 P.3d 952 (2001).
State Ex Rel. Brant v. Bank of Am., 31 P.3d 952 (Kan. 2001). · cites it 52ד17-1265, which says in part: "(a) The commissioner may: (1) Make public or private investigations within or outside of this state as necessary to determine whether any registration should be granted, denied or revoked or whether any person has violated or is about to violate any…”
Activator Supply Co. v. Wurth, 722 P.2d 1081 (Kan. 1986). · cites it 2דA staff attorney for the commissioner ordered an administrative inquiry of CFI pursuant to K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 17-1265. On March 5, 1985, the office of the securities commissioner gave notice by telephone to ASC and CFI that a temporary cease and desist order to halt their…”
Karstetter v. Love, 674 P.2d 1066 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 5דKarstetter argues he properly invoked his right against self-incrimination and his right to immunity pursuant to K.S.A. 17-1265(d). He contends the use of the documents during the *197 preliminary hearing violated his constitutional rights and he should therefore be discharged.”
K.S.A. § 17-1265(a)(1): 1 case
State Ex Rel. Brant v. Bank of Am., 31 P.3d 952 (Kan. 2001). “17-1265, which says in part: "(a) The commissioner may: (1) Make public or private investigations within or outside of this state as necessary to determine whether any registration should be granted, denied or revoked or whether any person has violated or is about to violate any…”
K.S.A. § 17-1265(a)(l): 1 case
State Ex Rel. Brant v. Bank of Am., 31 P.3d 952 (Kan. 2001). “17-1265, which says in part: "(a) The commissioner may: (1) Make public or private investigations within or outside of this state as necessary to determine whether any registration should be granted, denied or revoked or whether any person has violated or is about to violate any…”
K.S.A. § 17-1265(d): 2 cases
State Ex Rel. Brant v. Bank of Am., 31 P.3d 952 (Kan. 2001). “17-1265, which says in part: "(a) The commissioner may: (1) Make public or private investigations within or outside of this state as necessary to determine whether any registration should be granted, denied or revoked or whether any person has violated or is about to violate any…”
Karstetter v. Love, 674 P.2d 1066 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984). “Karstetter argues he properly invoked his right against self-incrimination and his right to immunity pursuant to K.S.A. 17-1265(d). He contends the use of the documents during the *197 preliminary hearing violated his constitutional rights and he should therefore be discharged.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.