K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-107a (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-107a.

History: L. 1927, ch. 191, § 1; L. 1939, ch. 178, § 1; Repealed, L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-4701; July 1, 1970.


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 50 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1947–2024 · leading case: Tuscano v. State, 478 P.2d 213 (Kan. 1970).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Tuscano v. State, 478 P.2d 213 (Kan. 1970). · cites it 6× “He was sentenced, pursuant to the provisions of the Habitual Criminal Act (K.S.A. 21-107a), to serve consecutive sentences for the two offenses.”
State v. Baker, 697 P.2d 1267 (Kan. 1985). · cites it 3× “The State invoked the then-applicable Habitual Criminal Act, K.S.A. 21-107a (Corrick), and the trial court imposed consecutive life sentences.”
State v. Freeman, 574 P.2d 950 (Kan. 1978). “21-534 as enhanced by K.S.A. 21-107a, under the circumstances disclosed by the record, is not so disproportionate to the offense and petitioner’s past history of crime as to constitute cruel and unusual punishment.”
State v. Tague, 363 P.2d 454 (Kan. 1961). · cites it 6× “The trial court did not apply the provisions of G. S. 1949, 21-107a as to sentencing habitual criminals in assessing the penalty under section 21-916.”
Richardson v. Hand, 320 P.2d 837 (Kan. 1958). · cites it 2× “Kansas, 1949, and said sentence being increased under the provisions of section 21-107a G. S. Kansas, 1949; . . .”
State v. Patterson, 939 P.2d 909 (Kan. 1997). “21-2611 or for imposing enhanced punishment under the habitual criminal act (K.S.A. 21-107a).” *484 Patterson contends that the record in the present case fails to establish that he was represented or that he waived representation “in the cases used to enhance this sentence.”
State v. Richardson, 399 P.2d 799 (Kan. 1965). “1949, 21-107a (now K.S.A. 21-107a) both the petitioner and his counsel stated in open court they had been given prior notice this request would be made by the prosecution.”
Aeby v. State, 427 P.2d 453 (Kan. 1967). · cites it 2× “21-521, the court imposed sentence under Section 21-107a, commonly known as the Habitual Criminal Act of not more than 25 years and not less than 15 years *125 to run consecutive to the sentences imposed for convictions under Counts 1 and 2 of the Information.”
State v. Lekas, 442 P.2d 11 (Kan. 1968). “" He was sentenced under the habitual criminal act (K.S.A. 21-107a) on the basis of one prior felony conviction, the prior felony asserted being the robbery conviction alleged in the information.”
State v. Maggard, 829 P.2d 591 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992). “21-2611 or for imposing enhanced punishment under the habitual criminal act (K.S.A. 21-107a).” We have reviewed the evidence submitted by the State of Kansas to impose the Habitual Criminal Act.”
State v. One 1978 Chevrolet Corvette Vin 1Z87L8S437138, 667 P.2d 893 (Kan. Ct. App. 1983). “Our habitual criminal act (K.S.A. 21-107a) has never expressly provided for a hearing on the question of prior felony convictions.”
City of Wichita v. Lucero, 874 P.2d 1144 (Kan. 1994). “) A similar statute is K.S.A. 21-107a, commonly known as the habitual criminal statute.”
Show all 50 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.