K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-437 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-437.

History: G.S. 1868, ch. 31, § 44; R.S. 1923, 21-437; Repealed, L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-4701; July 1, 1970.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1966–1995 · leading case: Poe v. Menghini, 339 F. Supp. 986 (D. Kan. 1972).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Poe v. Menghini, 339 F. Supp. 986 (D. Kan. 1972). “If, in the future, plaintiffs should be able to show bad faith or harassment, as contemplated by the Supreme Court in the Dombrowski case, injunctive relief would be appropriate and available.”
State v. Darling, 419 P.2d 836 (Kan. 1966). “: This is a criminal action in which the defendant was charged with employing an instrument with intent to procure an abortion or miscarriage of a pregnant woman on the 30th day of August, 1963, as denounced in K.S.A. 21-437. The case was tried to a jury and upon conviction…”
State v. Christiansen, 904 P.2d 968 (Kan. 1995). · cites it 6× “In Jamieson , the defendant was charged with procuring an abortion contrary to the provisions of K.S.A. 21-437 (Corrick). At that time, the Kansas abortion statute, after proscribing the procurement of an abortion, included the following proviso: "unless the same shall have been…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.