K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-4714 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-4714.

History: L. 1992, ch. 239, § 14; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 262; L. 1994, ch. 291, § 57; L. 1994, ch. 341, § 16; L. 1996, ch. 258, § 5; L. 2003, ch. 135, § 5; L. 2006, ch. 172, § 3; L. 2007, ch. 195, § 13; L. 2008, ch. 183, § 6; L. 2009, ch. 132, § 12; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases, 1994–2014 · leading case: State v. Schow, 197 P.3d 825 (Kan. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Schow, 197 P.3d 825 (Kan. 2008). · cites it 12× “21-4714 begins in subsection (a) by directing that “[t]he court shall order the preparation of the presentence investigation [PSI] report by the court services officer [CSO] as soon as possible after conviction of the defendant.”
State v. Schow, 161 P.3d 222 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 16× “K.S.A.2006 Supp. 21-4714 provides that the district court shall order the court services officer to prepare a PSI report in every case as soon as possible after the defendant has been convicted.”
State v. Hankins, 880 P.2d 271 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 4× “K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4714(b)(5). K.S.A. 1993 Supp.”
State v. Hatt, 38 P.3d 738 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 4× “He argues the trial court erred in taking judicial notice of his PSI report filed for his 1996 conviction under K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4714(f). He claims his California conviction for burglary should be categorized as a nonperson felony.”
State v. Hitt, 42 P.3d 732 (Kan. 2002). “21-4709, K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 21-4711, and K.S.A. 2001 Supp.”
State v. Van Hoet, 89 P.3d 606 (Kan. 2004). “21-4604 and amendments thereto or for crimes committed on or after July 1,1993, a presentence investigation report as provided in K.S.A. 21-4714 and amendments thereto, the trial judge may order the defendant committed for mental examination, evaluation and report.”
State v. Foster, 180 P.3d 1074 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “After the defendant's plea was accepted, a presentence investigation was ordered, as required by K.S.A. 21-4714(a). The court services officer who prepared that report properly reviewed the potential special sentencing rules that might apply.”
State v. Garcia, 283 P.3d 165 (Kan. 2012). “K.S.A. 21-4714. This procedure makes some sense for completing a final presentence investigation report (PSI), because the PSI includes the current crime or crimes of conviction.”
State v. LaMunyon, 911 P.2d 151 (Kan. 1996). “21-4709, K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4710, K.S.A. 1993 Supp.”
State v. Hobbs, 71 P.3d 1140 (Kan. 2003). “96 CR 209, and the trial court may take judicial notice of the report pursuant to K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4714(f). Contrary to Hatt’s arguments, these two statutory provisions are not in conflict.”
State v. Hankins, 319 P.3d 571 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014). “For example, under the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act, K.S.A. 2010 Supp. 21-4714(a) provides: “The court shall order the preparation of the presentence investigation report by the court services officer as soon as possible after conviction of the defendant.”
State v. Lakey, 920 P.2d 470 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “De *586 fendant argues that under K.S.A. 21-4714(f), in a subsequent felony sentencing proceeding a court is permitted to take judicial notice of an earlier presentence criminal history worksheet and, thus, the unproven crimes in this criminal history worksheet may prejudice him…”
Show all 19 citing cases →
— K.S.A. § 21-4714(a) — 3 cases
State v. Foster, 180 P.3d 1074 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008). “After the defendant's plea was accepted, a presentence investigation was ordered, as required by K.S.A. 21-4714(a). The court services officer who prepared that report properly reviewed the potential special sentencing rules that might apply.”
State v. Hankins, 319 P.3d 571 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014). “For example, under the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act, K.S.A. 2010 Supp. 21-4714(a) provides: “The court shall order the preparation of the presentence investigation report by the court services officer as soon as possible after conviction of the defendant.”
State v. Turner, 919 P.2d 370 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996).
— K.S.A. § 21-4714(b) — 1 case
State v. Schow, 197 P.3d 825 (Kan. 2008). “21-4714 begins in subsection (a) by directing that “[t]he court shall order the preparation of the presentence investigation [PSI] report by the court services officer [CSO] as soon as possible after conviction of the defendant.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4714(b)(5) — 5 cases
State v. Schow, 197 P.3d 825 (Kan. 2008). “21-4714 begins in subsection (a) by directing that “[t]he court shall order the preparation of the presentence investigation [PSI] report by the court services officer [CSO] as soon as possible after conviction of the defendant.”
State v. Hitt, 42 P.3d 732 (Kan. 2002). “21-4709, K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 21-4711, and K.S.A. 2001 Supp.”
State v. LaMunyon, 911 P.2d 151 (Kan. 1996). “21-4709, K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4710, K.S.A. 1993 Supp.”
State v. Hankins, 880 P.2d 271 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994). “K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4714(b)(5). K.S.A. 1993 Supp.”
State v. Lanning, 925 P.2d 1145 (Kan. 1996).
— K.S.A. § 21-4714(b)(l) — 1 case
State v. Reutebuch, 953 P.2d 227 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).
— K.S.A. § 21-4714(c) — 2 cases
State v. Schow, 197 P.3d 825 (Kan. 2008). “21-4714 begins in subsection (a) by directing that “[t]he court shall order the preparation of the presentence investigation [PSI] report by the court services officer [CSO] as soon as possible after conviction of the defendant.”
State v. Reutebuch, 953 P.2d 227 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).
— K.S.A. § 21-4714(d) — 1 case
State v. Turner, 919 P.2d 370 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996).
— K.S.A. § 21-4714(f) — 9 cases
State v. Schow, 197 P.3d 825 (Kan. 2008). “21-4714 begins in subsection (a) by directing that “[t]he court shall order the preparation of the presentence investigation [PSI] report by the court services officer [CSO] as soon as possible after conviction of the defendant.”
State v. Schow, 161 P.3d 222 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007). “K.S.A.2006 Supp. 21-4714 provides that the district court shall order the court services officer to prepare a PSI report in every case as soon as possible after the defendant has been convicted.”
State v. Hatt, 38 P.3d 738 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002). “He argues the trial court erred in taking judicial notice of his PSI report filed for his 1996 conviction under K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4714(f). He claims his California conviction for burglary should be categorized as a nonperson felony.”
State v. Hankins, 880 P.2d 271 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994). “K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4714(b)(5). K.S.A. 1993 Supp.”
State v. Hobbs, 71 P.3d 1140 (Kan. 2003). “96 CR 209, and the trial court may take judicial notice of the report pursuant to K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4714(f). Contrary to Hatt’s arguments, these two statutory provisions are not in conflict.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.