Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-915 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-915.

History: L. 1895, ch. 151, § 1; R.S. 1923, 21-915; Repealed, L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-4701; July 1, 1970.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1940–1972 · leading case: State v. One Bally Coney Island No. 21011 Gaming Table, 258 P.2d 225 (Kan. 1953).
State v. One Bally Coney Island No. 21011 Gaming Table, 258 P.2d 225 (Kan. 1953). · cites it 2× “) While in the Waite case we defined the word “property” within the meaning of section 21-1508, in the instant case the word “property” in section 21-915 is used in the same manner, and the same rule of law is applicable thereto.”
State v. Nelson, 502 P.2d 841 (Kan. 1972). “The former statutes, K.S.A. 21-915 through 21-936, and 21-1501 through 21-1510 approached gambling by prohibiting specific activities.”
State v. Tague, 363 P.2d 454 (Kan. 1961). · cites it 2× “After trial by jury, the defendant was convicted under sections 21-916 and 41-803, and was acquitted of violating section 21-915. The first two sections mentioned in the information constitute felony charges relating to the operation of a gambling house.”
State v. Ross, 105 P.2d 879 (Kan. 1940). · cites it 2× “, to be used as a place for playing games of cards for money and property, as defined in section 21-915, General Statutes of Kansas, 1935, contrary to the form of the statutes,” etc.”
State v. Greenwood, 352 P.2d 434 (Kan. 1960). · cites it 2× “1949, 21-915 makes certain acts punishable as felonies, while at least very similar acts are made only misdemeanors by G.”
State v. Twenty Nine Slot Machines, 356 P.2d 854 (Kan. 1960). “I have restudied the statutes and the cases in regard to the matters involved in the above entitled case and it is my opinion that this action was brought under the wrong statute, that Sections 21-915, 21-916, 21-918, 21-925, 21-935 and 21-944 do not apply in this case, as there…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.