22-4609.
Profiling prohibited as basis for making stop, search or arrest.
It is unlawful to use racial or other biased-based policing in:
(a) Determining the existence of probable cause to take into custody or to arrest an individual;
(b) constituting a reasonable and articulable suspicion that an offense has been or is being committed so as to justify the detention of an individual or the investigatory stop of a vehicle; or
(c) determining the existence of probable cause to conduct a search of an individual or a conveyance.
History:
L. 2005, ch. 159, § 4; L. 2011, ch. 94, § 2; May 26.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. In a hearing on a motion to suppress evidence, whether a law enforcement officer unlawfully used racial or other biased-based policing is a question of fact to be determined by the district court. State v. Gray, 51 Kan. App. 2d 1085, 1096, 360 P.3d 472 (2015).
2. When considering an alleged violation of Kansas' biased-based policing statutes, judge must examine more than the ultimate justification of a traffic stop and must consider whether an officer "unreasonably used' a characteristic listed in section when deciding to initiate the enforcement action. State v. Gray, 306 Kan. 1287, 1298, 403 P.3d 1220 (2017).
3. Approaching two black males because they are "staring hard at you" is an unreasonable use of race to initiate a law enforcement action. State v. Gill, 56 Kan. App. 2d 1278, 1288, 445 P.3d 1174 (2019).
State v. Gray, 360 P.3d 472 (Kan. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 14דGray’s counsel briefly argued that the stop violated the racial profiling prohibitions in K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 22-4606 and K.S.A. 2014 Supp.”
State v. Gill (Kan. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 18ד22-4609 is designed to prohibit the use of racial or other biased-based policing, the use of this kind of policing is restricted under the following circumstances: (1) Determining the existence of probable cause to take into custody or to arrest an individual; (2) establishing a…”
State v. Gray (Kan. 2017). · cites it 11ד: K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 22-4609 provides in part: "It is unlawful to use racial or other biased-based policing in: .”
Costello v. Kansas High. Patrol (D. Kan. 2025). · cites it 8דAs Count III, Plaintiff alleges a violation of K.S.A. § 22-4609. Id. at 4. Plaintiff names as defendants the Kansas Highway Patrol and State Trooper Andrew B.”
State v. Anderson (Kan. 2026). · cites it 4דFinally, Gray addressed a defendant who sought to exclude evidence allegedly obtained during a traffic stop as a result of racial profiling in violation of K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 22-4609. The Gray court clarified the general procedure in K.”
— K.S.A. § 22-4609(b) — 2 cases
State v. Gray, 360 P.3d 472 (Kan. Ct. App. 2015). “Gray’s counsel briefly argued that the stop violated the racial profiling prohibitions in K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 22-4606 and K.S.A. 2014 Supp.”
State v. Gray (Kan. 2017). “: K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 22-4609 provides in part: "It is unlawful to use racial or other biased-based policing in: .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.