Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 3-601 (2026)

Acceptance and expenditure of federal and other moneys; compliance

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

3-601. Acceptance and expenditure of federal and other moneys; compliance. All political subdivisions of the state now or hereafter authorized by the laws of this state to acquire, operate, maintain or regulate an airport or airports are hereby authorized, acting singly or jointly, to accept, receive, receipt for, disburse and expend federal monies, and other monies, either public or private, for the acquisition, planning, construction, enlargement, improvement, maintenance, equipment, or operation of airports and other air navigation facilities, and sites therefor, and to comply with the provisions of the laws of the United States and any rules and regulations made thereunder for the expenditure of federal monies upon such airports and other air navigation facilities.

History: L. 1947, ch. 14, § 1; April 11.


Previous | Next

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1981–2020 · leading case: State v. Meeks, 415 P.3d 400 (Kan. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Meeks, 415 P.3d 400 (Kan. 2018). “Model Sentencing and Corrections Act § 3-601, 10 U.L.A. 443 (2001). In a majority of states, courts follow such a model, considering a defendant's circumstances and his or her ability to pay before setting a restitution amount.”
Litwin v. Barrier, 626 P.2d 1232 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 3× “In interpreting subsection (a) of code section 3-601(3), (K.S.A. 84-3-601[3]), 3 Anderson Uniform Commercial Code § 3-601:16, p.”
State v. Roberts, 461 P.3d 77 (Kan. Ct. App. 2020). “Model Sentencing and Corrections Act § 3-601, 10 U.L.A. 443 (2001). In a majority of states, courts follow such a model, considering a defendant's circumstances and his or her ability to pay before setting a restitution amount.”
K.S.A. § 3-601(3): 1 case
Litwin v. Barrier, 626 P.2d 1232 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981). “In interpreting subsection (a) of code section 3-601(3), (K.S.A. 84-3-601[3]), 3 Anderson Uniform Commercial Code § 3-601:16, p.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.