Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 38-1512 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
38-1512.
History: L. 1982, ch. 182, § 12; L. 1983, ch. 140, § 16; L. 1985, ch. 115, § 41; L. 1991, ch. 112, § 2; Repealed, L. 2006, ch. 200, § 120; January 1, 2007.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1989–2005 · leading case: In re T.D., 3 P.3d 590 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).
In re T.D., 3 P.3d 590 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). “It contends K.S.A. 38-1512 provides SRS with the authority to determine which counselors are to provide those types of court-ordered services.”
In Re Td, 3 P.3d 590 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). “It contends K.S.A. 38-1512 provides SRS with the authority to determine which counselors are to provide those types of court-ordered services.”
State ex rel. D.S.M. v. Mealey, 112 P.3d 956 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). “On appeal, Mealey argues that the “strict scrutiny” standard rather than the rational basis standard applies and that the statutes have not been shown necessary to serve a compelling state interest and are not narrowly drawn to do so.”
State ex rel. Sec'y v. Maddox, 772 P.2d 820 (Kan. Ct. App. 1989). “Under K.S.A. 38-1512(c), the secretary of S.R.S.”
— K.S.A. § 38-1512(a)(2) — 2 cases
In re T.D., 3 P.3d 590 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). “It contends K.S.A. 38-1512 provides SRS with the authority to determine which counselors are to provide those types of court-ordered services.”
In Re Td, 3 P.3d 590 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). “It contends K.S.A. 38-1512 provides SRS with the authority to determine which counselors are to provide those types of court-ordered services.”
— K.S.A. § 38-1512(a)(3) — 2 cases
In re T.D., 3 P.3d 590 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). “It contends K.S.A. 38-1512 provides SRS with the authority to determine which counselors are to provide those types of court-ordered services.”
In Re Td, 3 P.3d 590 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). “It contends K.S.A. 38-1512 provides SRS with the authority to determine which counselors are to provide those types of court-ordered services.”
— K.S.A. § 38-1512(a)(4) — 1 case
State ex rel. D.S.M. v. Mealey, 112 P.3d 956 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). “On appeal, Mealey argues that the “strict scrutiny” standard rather than the rational basis standard applies and that the statutes have not been shown necessary to serve a compelling state interest and are not narrowly drawn to do so.”
— K.S.A. § 38-1512(c) — 1 case
State ex rel. Sec'y v. Maddox, 772 P.2d 820 (Kan. Ct. App. 1989). “Under K.S.A. 38-1512(c), the secretary of S.R.S.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.