K.S.A. » Chapter 38
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 38-1583a (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

38-1583a.

History: L. 1982, ch. 182, § 54; L. 1983, ch. 140, § 27; L. 1991, ch. 115, § 1; L. 1993, ch. 195, § 1; L. 1994, ch. 301, § 7; L. 1998, ch. 139, § 8; L. 1999, ch. 156, § 10; L. 2000, ch. 174, § 14; Repealed, L. 2001, ch. 211, § 18; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2001–2006 · leading case: In the Interest of E.T., 137 P.3d 1035 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In the Interest of E.T., 137 P.3d 1035 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “Although K.S.A. 38-1583a set forth the factors to be considered in a termination proceeding, this court noted that the statute provided guidance in the child in need of care hearing.”
In the Interest of R.B.S., 36 P.3d 300 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 4× “This argument ignores the more specific and thus superseding effect of K.S.A. 38-1583a(b). In re N.D.G., 20 Kan.”
In Re Rbs, 36 P.3d 300 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 4× “This argument ignores the more specific and thus superseding effect of K.S.A. 38-1583a(b). In re N.D.G., 20 Kan.”
K.S.A. § 38-1583a(b): 2 cases
In the Interest of R.B.S., 36 P.3d 300 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “This argument ignores the more specific and thus superseding effect of K.S.A. 38-1583a(b). In re N.D.G., 20 Kan.”
In Re Rbs, 36 P.3d 300 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “This argument ignores the more specific and thus superseding effect of K.S.A. 38-1583a(b). In re N.D.G., 20 Kan.”
K.S.A. § 38-1583a(b)(2): 3 cases
In the Interest of E.T., 137 P.3d 1035 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). “Although K.S.A. 38-1583a set forth the factors to be considered in a termination proceeding, this court noted that the statute provided guidance in the child in need of care hearing.”
In the Interest of R.B.S., 36 P.3d 300 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “This argument ignores the more specific and thus superseding effect of K.S.A. 38-1583a(b). In re N.D.G., 20 Kan.”
In Re Rbs, 36 P.3d 300 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “This argument ignores the more specific and thus superseding effect of K.S.A. 38-1583a(b). In re N.D.G., 20 Kan.”
K.S.A. § 38-1583a(b)(6): 2 cases
In the Interest of R.B.S., 36 P.3d 300 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “This argument ignores the more specific and thus superseding effect of K.S.A. 38-1583a(b). In re N.D.G., 20 Kan.”
In Re Rbs, 36 P.3d 300 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “This argument ignores the more specific and thus superseding effect of K.S.A. 38-1583a(b). In re N.D.G., 20 Kan.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.