History:
L. 1957, ch. 256, § 34; L. 1969, ch. 224, § 7; L. 1976, ch. 207, § 32; L. 1978, ch. 158, § 30; L. 1981, ch. 183, § 2; Repealed, L. 1982, ch. 182, § 150; January 1, 1983.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Order waiving exclusive original jurisdiction under K.S.A. 38-808 final order; appealable. In re Templeton, 202 Kan. 89, 90, 92, 447 P.2d 158.
2. Appeal from order waiving jurisdiction must be heard and disposed of de novo. In re Templeton, 202 Kan. 89, 92, 447 P.2d 158; In re Long, 202 Kan. 216, 217, 218, 448 P.2d 25.
3. State has no right of appeal from order of juvenile court declining to waive its original jurisdiction. In re Waterman, 212 Kan. 826, 829, 830, 832, 512 P.2d 466.
4. Appeal hereunder is recourse for disputing correctness of juvenile court's determination of jurisdictional facts necessary to support order waiving jurisdiction. State v. Shepherd, 213 Kan. 498, 505, 516 P.2d 945.
5. Appeal to district court not moot because juvenile no longer confined; dismissal reversed. State v. Bolden, 2 Kan. App. 2d 470, 472, 581 P.2d 1195.
6. Natural mother proper person to appeal when child found dependent and neglected. In re Hamlett, 2 Kan. App. 2d 642, 643, 586 P.2d 277.
7. Mentioned; parent in deprived child action is a party to the action and has right of access to the court's social file. Nunn v. Morrison, 227 Kan. 730, 734, 608 P.2d 1359.
8. Right to meaningful appeal denied by court's failure to provide an acceptable record; abuse of discretion; new trial. In re Trotter, 3 Kan. App. 2d 566, 567, 598 P.2d 557.
9. Right of appeal by relative is granted only on the part of the minor; relative bound by contemporaneous objection to evidence rule. In re Collins, 3 Kan. App. 2d 585, 586, 598 P.2d 1075.
10. General references to persons interested in child not sufficient authority to grant grandmother intervention in severance proceeding. Wilson & Walker v. State, 230 Kan. 49, 54, 630 P.2d 1102 (1981).
11. Due diligence to attempt to locate parent before service by publication may be used to sever parental rights; if parent located publication service may not be used. In re Woodard, 231 Kan. 544, 550, 646 P.2d 1105 (1982).
In the Interest of N.A.C., 329 P.3d 458 (Kan. 2014). “) See K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 38-834(b); see also Kansas Judicial Council Bulletin, June 1981, p.”
In the Interest of Woodard, 646 P.2d 1105 (Kan. 1982). “2d 466 [1973]), that appellant’s only remedy in this case was to appeal the trial court’s January 22, 1980, order within thirty days pursuant to K.S.A. 38-834. We agree with the position of the appellant.”
In Re Hamlett, 586 P.2d 277 (Kan. Ct. App. 1978). “K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 38-834( b ) provides in part: "An appeal shall be allowed by any child from any final order in any proceeding pursuant to the juvenile code.”
Talmage v. Ransom, 586 P.2d 277 (Kan. Ct. App. 1978). “K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 38-834(b) provides in part: “An appeal shall be allowed by any child from any final order in any proceeding pursuant to the juvenile code .”
In the Interest of Collins, 598 P.2d 1075 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 3דThe grandmother is granted a right to appeal by K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 38-834. She states that the contemporaneous objection rule does not apply to her since she was excluded by the trial court from the hearing other than for the purpose of giving testimony, and that therefore she…”
State v. Bolden, 581 P.2d 1195 (Kan. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 2דHe exercised his right to appeal the adjudication of delinquency to the district court pursuant to K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 38-834(b). Subsequent to the adjudication, he was committed to the custody of the State Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services.”
In re N.A.C. (Kan. 2014). “) See K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 38-834(b); see also Kansas Judicial Council Bulletin, June 1981, p.”
In the Interest of Trotter, 598 P.2d 557 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979). “Nonetheless, it is clear that the appellee Archie Trotter has been denied his right to a meaningful appeal under the juvenile code, K.S.A. 1978 Supp. 38-834, due to the total lack of a transcript and the inability of the trial court and counsel for the involved parties to…”
— K.S.A. § 38-834(b) — 4 cases
In the Interest of N.A.C., 329 P.3d 458 (Kan. 2014). “) See K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 38-834(b); see also Kansas Judicial Council Bulletin, June 1981, p.”
Talmage v. Ransom, 586 P.2d 277 (Kan. Ct. App. 1978). “K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 38-834(b) provides in part: “An appeal shall be allowed by any child from any final order in any proceeding pursuant to the juvenile code .”
In re N.A.C. (Kan. 2014). “) See K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 38-834(b); see also Kansas Judicial Council Bulletin, June 1981, p.”
State v. Bolden, 581 P.2d 1195 (Kan. Ct. App. 1978). “He exercised his right to appeal the adjudication of delinquency to the district court pursuant to K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 38-834(b). Subsequent to the adjudication, he was committed to the custody of the State Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services.”
— K.S.A. § 38-834(h) — 1 case
State v. Bolden, 581 P.2d 1195 (Kan. Ct. App. 1978). “He exercised his right to appeal the adjudication of delinquency to the district court pursuant to K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 38-834(b). Subsequent to the adjudication, he was committed to the custody of the State Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.