K.S.A. » Chapter 47
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 47-309 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

47-309.

History: L. 1874, ch. 128, § 1; R.S. 1923, 47-309; Repealed, L. 1986, ch. 195, § 9; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Sufficiency of petition, names; presumption of validity. St. L.& S.F. Rly. Co. v. Mossman, 30 Kan. 336, 343, 2 P. 146.

2. Constitutionality of act questioned but not decided. The State v. Moon, 45 Kan. 145, 25 P. 614.

3. This act not repealed by Laws of 1879, ch. 175 (see K.S.A. 47-306 through 47-308). Martin v. Railway Co., 92 Kan. 595, 601, 141 P. 599.

4. Laws relating to loose stock discussed in construing K.S.A. 47-122. Wilson v. Rule, 169 Kan. 296, 299, 219 P.2d 690; Abbott v. Howard, 169 Kan. 305, 311, 219 P.2d 696.

5. County petition herd law did not establish strict liability; purpose was to require owners to fence animals in. Walborn v. Stockman, 10 Kan. App. 2d 597, 601, 602, 706 P.2d 465 (1985).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1985–1985 · leading case: Walborn v. Stockman, 706 P.2d 465 (Kan. Ct. App. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Walborn v. Stockman, 706 P.2d 465 (Kan. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 4× “47-122. Since the legislature in drafting the statewide herd law did not use the words “permit” or “allow” to run at large, as it had in the other herd laws (e.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.