K.S.A. » Chapter 56
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 56-328 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

56-328.

History: L. 1972, ch. 210, § 28; Repealed, L. 1998, ch. 93, § 76; July 1, 1999.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Cited; disposition of partnership interests under charging orders examined. City of Arkansas City v. Anderson, 12 Kan. App. 2d 490, 497, 749 P.2d 505 (1988).

2. Charging order creates lien where served superior to assignment constituting prior unperfected security interest. City of Arkansas City v. Anderson, 242 Kan. 875, 891, 752 P.2d 673 (1988).

3. Court lacking jurisdiction over Texas partnership which had not transacted business in Kansas; charging order; judicial sale of judgment debtor's partnership interest. Beech Acceptance Corp., Inc. v. Connell, 771 F. Supp. 1154 (1991).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1988–1991 · leading case: City of Arkansas City v. Anderson, 752 P.2d 673 (Kan. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Arkansas City v. Anderson, 752 P.2d 673 (Kan. 1988). · cites it 9× “On November 27, 1985, Arkansas City and Southwest National *878 obtained from the district court a charging order (K.S.A. 56-328) against the Andersons’ partnership interest in Land Opportunities Co.”
City of Arkansas City v. Anderson, 749 P.2d 505 (Kan. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 3× “K.S.A. 56-328 clearly allows a partner s interest to be “charged” so that the partnership would be required to pay the profits and proceeds directly to a judgment creditor rather than to the debtor partner.”
Beech Acceptance Corp. v. Connell, 771 F. Supp. 1154 (D. Kan. 1991). · cites it 2× “A partner may assign without condition his “interest in the partnership,” defined as that partner’s “share of the profits and surplus.”
— K.S.A. § 56-328(a) — 2 cases
City of Arkansas City v. Anderson, 752 P.2d 673 (Kan. 1988). “On November 27, 1985, Arkansas City and Southwest National *878 obtained from the district court a charging order (K.S.A. 56-328) against the Andersons’ partnership interest in Land Opportunities Co.”
City of Arkansas City v. Anderson, 749 P.2d 505 (Kan. Ct. App. 1988). “K.S.A. 56-328 clearly allows a partner s interest to be “charged” so that the partnership would be required to pay the profits and proceeds directly to a judgment creditor rather than to the debtor partner.”
— K.S.A. § 56-328(b) — 3 cases
City of Arkansas City v. Anderson, 752 P.2d 673 (Kan. 1988). “On November 27, 1985, Arkansas City and Southwest National *878 obtained from the district court a charging order (K.S.A. 56-328) against the Andersons’ partnership interest in Land Opportunities Co.”
City of Arkansas City v. Anderson, 749 P.2d 505 (Kan. Ct. App. 1988). “K.S.A. 56-328 clearly allows a partner s interest to be “charged” so that the partnership would be required to pay the profits and proceeds directly to a judgment creditor rather than to the debtor partner.”
Beech Acceptance Corp. v. Connell, 771 F. Supp. 1154 (D. Kan. 1991). “A partner may assign without condition his “interest in the partnership,” defined as that partner’s “share of the profits and surplus.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.