K.S.A. » Chapter 60
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 60-1201 (2026)

Proceedings for relief

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-1201. Proceedings for relief. Relief in the form of quo warranto shall be obtained under the same procedure as relief in other civil actions.

History: L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-1201; January 1, 1964.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2026 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Stovall v. Meneley, 22 P.3d 124 (Kan. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Stovall v. Meneley, 22 P.3d 124 (Kan. 2001). · cites it 4× “On May 24, 1999, a petition in quo warranto for the ouster of Meneley was filed pursuant to K.S.A. 60-1201 et. seq. on behalf of the State by the Attorney General.”
State Ex Rel. Miller v. Richardson, 623 P.2d 1317 (Kan. 1981). · cites it 4× “The quo warranto proceeding was brought under K.S.A. 60-1201 et seq. K.S.A. 60-1202 in pertinent part provides: “Such action may be brought .”
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Johnson, 807 P.2d 664 (Kan. 1991). · cites it 2× “*666 On June 7, 1989, the State of Kansas, through the attorney general, filed a petition in quo warranto in Shawnee County District Court, requesting an order "ousting and removing" Johnson from his position on the Board pursuant to K.S.A. 60-1201 et seq. On June 9, 1989,…”
McCormick v. City of Lawrence, Kansas, 253 F. Supp. 2d 1156 (D. Kan. 2003). · cites it 2× “Such an action, which is statutory in nature (K.S.A. § 60-1201 et seq.), is limited to injunctive or declaratory relief.”
State v. Morrison, 359 P.3d 60 (Kan. 2015). · cites it 2× “The State contends that the district court applied the correct legal standard and, in turn, properly determined that Morrison's ouster was justified under the facts of this case.”
State Ex Rel. Stovall v. Martinez, 996 P.2d 371 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). “Although the term quo warranto was omitted from the pretrial order, the *15 trial court found both parties had proceeded throughout the litigation with an understanding of the nature of the action. Moreover, the petition states the AG’s authority to bring the action against…”
Kelly v. Kobach (Kan. 2026). “Governor's quo warranto action On October 31, 2025, the Governor filed a petition in quo warranto with this court under K.S.A. 60-1201 et seq., seeking a declaration that, as the State's "supreme executive," she possesses constitutional authority relating to litigation involving…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.