K.S.A. » Chapter 60
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 60-403 (2026)

Exclusionary rules not to apply to undisputed matter

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-403. Exclusionary rules not to apply to undisputed matter. If upon the hearing there is no bona fide dispute between the parties as to a material fact, such fact may be proved by any relevant evidence, and exclusionary rules shall not apply, subject, however, to K.S.A. 60-445 and any valid claim of privilege.

History: L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-403; January 1, 1964.


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1942–2013 · leading case: State v. Prine, 303 P.3d 662 (Kan. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Prine, 303 P.3d 662 (Kan. 2013). “60-455 evidence depends on three factors: [1] evidence must be relevant to prove material fact; [2] material fact must be disputed; [3] probative value of evidence must not be substantially outweighed by risk of unfair prej *478 udice); see also K.S.A. 60-403 (exclusionary rules…”
State v. Myrick & Nelms, 616 P.2d 1066 (Kan. 1980). “Myrick baldly asserts the statements should be admitted pursuant to K.S.A. 60-403. That assertion appears in his brief without discussion and is apparently abandoned in favor of an argument that the statements should have been admitted pursuant to K.”
State v. Smith, 293 P.3d 669 (Kan. 2012). “60-445 requires probative versus prejudicial balancing only when opposing party claims surprise, balancing may require exclusion “as a rule of necessity” when probative value substantially outweighed by risk of unfair prejudice); see K.S.A. 60-403. Under the version of K.S.A.”
Howell v. Flora, 127 P.2d 721 (Kan. 1942). · cites it 2× “1935, 60-401, every action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest, except as otherwise provided in section 60-403, Under the latter section “a person expressly authorized by statute” may bring an action without joining with him the person for whose benefit…”
Millers Nat'l Ins. v. Bunds, 149 P.2d 350 (Kan. 1944). · cites it 6× “) Section 60-403 provides, in part, that “a person with whom or in whose name a contract is made for the benefit of another .”
State v. Woolverton, 131 P.3d 1253 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). “See K.S.A. 60-403. In State v. Cooper, 252 Kan.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.