Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 60-418 (2026)
Oath
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
60-418. Oath. Every witness before testifying shall be required to express his or her purpose to testify by the oath or affirmation required by law.
History: L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-418; January 1, 1964.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1929–2021 · leading case: State v. Atkisson, 425 P.3d 334 (Kan. 2018).
State v. Atkisson, 425 P.3d 334 (Kan. 2018). “See K.S.A. 60-418 ("Every witness before testifying shall be required to express his or her purpose to testify by the oath or affirmation required by law.”
In re Petition for Habeas Corpus by Bowman, 441 P.3d 451 (Kan. 2019). “22-3434 (establishing closed circuit procedure for certain child witnesses); K.S.A. 60-418 ("Every witness before testifying shall be required to express his or her purpose to testify by the oath or affirmation required by law.”
State v. Warden, 891 P.2d 1074 (Kan. 1995). “K.S.A. 60-418 states, “Every witness before testifying shall be required to express his or her purpose to testify by the oath or affirmation required by law.”
State v. Rodriquez-Garcia, 937 P.2d 446 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997). “Rodriquez-Garcia further argues that the prosecutor’s statements contravene K.S.A. 60-418, which provides for testimony under oath or affirmation, and K.”
Guy v. Modern Woodmen, 280 P. 756 (Kan. 1929). “There was a substantial compliance with section 60-418 of the Revised Statutes, and the defendant was thereafter discharged from liability to the plaintiff.”
State v. Noches-Padilla (Kan. Ct. App. 2021). “The State acknowledges Bagley's holding but argues it was an incorrect reading of the statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.