K.S.A. » Chapter 60
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 60-910 (2026)

Vacating or modifying order

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-910. Vacating or modifying order. (a) Before final judgment. At any time before the judgment the party restrained or enjoined may apply to the judge of the court in which the action is brought, to vacate or modify the same. The application may be made upon the petition and affidavits upon which the restraining order or injunction is granted, or upon affidavits on the part of the party restrained, with or without answer.

(b) After final judgment. Any interested party, including a party subsequently acquiring an interest in the subject matter of the injunction, may file a petition in the same action to have a judgment of permanent injunction vacated or modified. The petition shall be verified, filed in the court from which the judgment issued, and shall state that there has been a change in conditions rendering the injunction unnecessary or partially unnecessary and that petitioner's interests are being adversely affected. The changed conditions shall be stated in reasonable detail. The procedure pertaining to original civil actions shall be followed. If the judge, after hearing, finds that the petition was not filed in good faith, the judge shall assess the expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees against the petitioner for those parties who have defended against the application, the same to be collected as costs in the action.

History: L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-910; January 1, 1964.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1973–2001 · leading case: Farmers Grp., Inc. v. Lee, 28 P.3d 413 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Farmers Grp., Inc. v. Lee, 28 P.3d 413 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 3× “KS.A. 60-910(b) The district judge found that intervenors satisfied the requirements of K.”
Koch Eng'g Co. v. Faulconer, 610 P.2d 1094 (Kan. 1980). “However, appellant questions the power and authority of the trial court to enlarge and supplement its injunction once the order has been entered.”
Vickridge First & Second Addition Homeowners Ass'n v. Catholic Diocese, 510 P.2d 1296 (Kan. 1973). “Finally, it should be noted that should there be a change in conditions, the parties have recourse to the remedy provided for in K.S.A. 60-910( b ). The judgment of the trial court is modified as above set out and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in harmony with…”
K.S.A. § 60-910(b): 1 case
Farmers Grp., Inc. v. Lee, 28 P.3d 413 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “KS.A. 60-910(b) The district judge found that intervenors satisfied the requirements of K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.