K.S.A. » Chapter 65
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 65-2a07 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

65-2a07.

History: L. 1972, ch. 228, § 7; L. 1975, ch. 462, § 71; Repealed, L. 1976, ch. 280, § 25; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Appeal hereunder discussed; certain corporations and persons not within definition of "health facility." Extendicare v. State Coordinating Council for Health Planning, 216 Kan. 527, 528, 529, 532 P.2d 1119.

2. Cited; taxpayers had standing to challenge issuance of general obligation bonds under K.S.A. 19-18,128 in absence of proper certificate of need. Pratt v. Board of Thomas County Comm'rs, 226 Kan. 333, 337, 597 P.2d 664.


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1975–1979 · leading case: Pratt v. Bd. of Thomas Cnty. Comm'rs, 597 P.2d 664 (Kan. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pratt v. Bd. of Thomas Cnty. Comm'rs, 597 P.2d 664 (Kan. 1979). “They maintain that, once a certificate of need is granted, rights of appeal are vested only in the applicant, in an appropriate health systems agency, or in another health facility as provided in K.S.A. 65-2a07 and 1978 Supp. 65-4809. If no appeal is taken by one of those…”
Extendicare v. St. Coordinating Coun. for Hlt. Plan., 532 P.2d 1119 (Kan. 1975). · cites it 4× “Thereafter each of the appellants filed a notice of appeal as provided by K.S.A. 65-2a07 from MACHPA's decision with the Kansas Coordinating Council for Health Planning, MACHPA, and the appropriate licensing agency and requested a hearing by an appeals panel.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.