K.S.A. » Chapter 65
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 65-3210 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

65-3210.

History: L. 1969, ch. 301, § 2; L. 1994, ch. 256, § 2; Repealed, L. 2007, ch. 127, § 33; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Whether widow was only person who had standing to assert conversion claim against hospital for unauthorized removal of deceased's bones examined. Perry v. St. Francis Hosp. and Medical Center, Inc., 865 F. Supp. 724, 727 (1994).

2. Issue regarding whether nurse acted in reckless disregard of UAGA (K.S.A. 65-3209 et seq.) concerning organ donations precluded summary judgment. Perry v. Saint Francis Hosp. & Medical Center, 886 F. Supp. 1551, 1557, 1559 (1995).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1994–1995 · leading case: Perry v. Saint Francis Hosp. & Med. Ctr., Inc., 886 F. Supp. 1551 (D. Kan. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Perry v. Saint Francis Hosp. & Med. Ctr., Inc., 886 F. Supp. 1551 (D. Kan. 1995). · cites it 3× “First, Nurse McDonald violated K.S.A. 65-3210(c) when she did not accept the plaintiffs’ initial negative response and continued to request tissue donations.”
Perry v. Saint Francis Hosp. & Med. Ctr., Inc., 865 F. Supp. 724 (D. Kan. 1994). · cites it 4× “3 At K.S.A. 65-3210, the Act provides: (b) Any of the following persons, in order of priority stated, when persons in prior classes are not available at the time of death, and in the absence of actual notice of contrary indications by the decedent or actual notice of opposition…”
K.S.A. § 65-3210(b): 1 case
Perry v. Saint Francis Hosp. & Med. Ctr., Inc., 865 F. Supp. 724 (D. Kan. 1994). “3 At K.S.A. 65-3210, the Act provides: (b) Any of the following persons, in order of priority stated, when persons in prior classes are not available at the time of death, and in the absence of actual notice of contrary indications by the decedent or actual notice of opposition…”
K.S.A. § 65-3210(c): 1 case
Perry v. Saint Francis Hosp. & Med. Ctr., Inc., 886 F. Supp. 1551 (D. Kan. 1995). “First, Nurse McDonald violated K.S.A. 65-3210(c) when she did not accept the plaintiffs’ initial negative response and continued to request tissue donations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.