K.S.A. » Chapter 72
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 72-5401 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

72-5401.

History: L. 1937, ch. 311, § 1; L. 1969, ch. 326, § 1; Repealed, L. 1974, ch. 301, § 11; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Considered; school board may not discriminate in employment of teachers but is not required to transfer teachers between schools to achieve integration of faculty. Londerholm v. Unified School District, 199 Kan. 312, 317, 327, 333, 430 P.2d 188.

2. Action for damages brought by teacher with tenure; plaintiff's retirement held to be voluntary. Wiley v. Board of Education, 205 Kan. 585, 586, 590, 470 P.2d 792.


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1979–1996 · leading case: Leaming v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 214, 750 P.2d 1041 (Kan. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Leaming v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 214, 750 P.2d 1041 (Kan. 1988). · cites it 2× “) K.S.A. 72-5401 through 72-5409 were repealed in 1974.”
Gillett v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 276, 605 P.2d 105 (Kan. 1980). “) K.S.A. 72-5401 through 72-5409 were repealed in 1974.”
Ottawa Educ. Ass'n v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 290, 666 P.2d 680 (Kan. 1983). · cites it 2× “The principal issue is whether certain provisions of a negotiated agreement between OEA and the Board, relating to the reduction of the teaching staff, violates any provisions of the teachers’ contracts statutes, K.S.A. 72-5401 to 72-5446. The parties entered into a negotiated…”
Baldwin v. Bd. of Educ., 930 P.2d 18 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996). “1949, K.S.A. 72-5401 et seq.), which was repealed in 1974 and replaced by K.”
Parsons—Nat'l Educ. Ass'n v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 503, 593 P.2d 414 (Kan. 1979). “Both subjects were formerly covered to some extent by statute (K.S.A. 72-5401 to 72-5407). These statutes have since been repealed by the legislature and are no longer law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.