75-6107.
Same; judgment against governmental entity, effect; judgment against employee, effect.
(a) The judgment in an action subject to the provisions of this act against a governmental entity shall constitute a complete bar to any action by the claimant, by reason of the same subject matter, against the employee whose act or omission gave rise to the claim.
(b) Any judgment against an employee whose act or omission gave rise to the claim shall constitute a complete bar to any action for injury by the claimant, by reason of the same subject matter, against a governmental entity.
History:
L. 1979, ch. 186, § 7; July 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2024 · leading case:
Ashley Clinic v. Coates, 545 P.3d 1020 (Kan. Ct. App. 2024).
Ashley Clinic v. Coates, 545 P.3d 1020 (Kan. Ct. App. 2024).
· cites it 5× “K.S.A. 75-6107 reads: "(a) The judgment in an action subject to the provisions of this act against a governmental entity shall constitute a complete bar to any action by the claimant, by reason of the same subject matter, against the employee whose act or omission gave rise to…”
Jackson v. City of Kansas City, 680 P.2d 877 (Kan. 1984).
“The act also provides, under K.S.A. 75-6107, that there can be only one action commenced by reason of the same subject matter, and that a judgment against the governmental entity shall be a bar to a subsequent action against its employees and vice versa.”
K.S.A. § 75-6107(a): 2 cases
Ashley Clinic v. Coates, 545 P.3d 1020 (Kan. Ct. App. 2024).
“K.S.A. 75-6107 reads: "(a) The judgment in an action subject to the provisions of this act against a governmental entity shall constitute a complete bar to any action by the claimant, by reason of the same subject matter, against the employee whose act or omission gave rise to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.