76-3001.
Title.
This act shall be known and may be cited as the interstate corrections compact.
History:
L. 1972, ch. 349, § 1; January 1, 1973.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Kansas prisoner transferred to another state under this compact remains subject to parole authority of Kansas. Hannon v. Maynard, 3 Kan. App. 2d 522, 523, 524, 597 P.2d 1125.
2. Cited; applicability of Kansas regulations in disciplinary proceedings as required by Iowa interstate corrections compact examined. Cameron v. Mills, 645 F. Supp. 1119 (1986).
Trujillo v. Williams, 465 F.3d 1210 (10th Cir. 2006). “3; Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 76-3001 to 76-3003; Ky.”
Menefee v. Werholtz, 368 F. App'x 879 (10th Cir. 2010). “Procedural History Menefee and Blevins, together, filed their pro se complaint in federal district court against various prison officials, asserting that defendants violated their rights under the Interstate Corrections Compact (ICC), 1 Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 76-3001 to 76-3003, and…”
Lynn v. Simmons, 95 P.3d 99 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003). “*978 Moreover, under the Interstate Corrections Compact, K.S.A. 76-3001 et seq. (the ICC), inmates confined in another state “shall at all times be subject to the jurisdiction of the sending state.”
Hannon v. Maynard, 597 P.2d 1125 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 2דIn a memorandum opinion filed January 6, 1977, the district court concluded that Hannon’s petition was without merit and denied relief, with this appeal following.”
Boyd v. Werholtz, 203 P.3d 1 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008). “He received consecutive sentences of 15 years to life for each conviction and was then transferred to the Washington State Department of Corrections pursuant to the Interstate Corrections Compact (ICC), K.S.A. 76-3001 et seq., where he remains today.”
Stauch (ID 129417) v. Zmuda (D. Kan. 2024). · cites it 2דThe Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be 2 See Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 76-3001 to 76-3003; Colo.”
Talkington v. Schnurr, Warden (Kan. Ct. App. 2026). “He was then transferred to the Washington State Department of Corrections pursuant to the Interstate Corrections Compact (ICC), K.S.A. 76-3001 et seq. In 2006, Boyd wrote a letter to the Secretary of the KDOC, stating that his sentence had been "'grossly miscalculated'" and that…”
Trujillo v. Williams (10th Cir. 2006). “3; Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 76-3001 to 76-3003; Ky.”
Chappell v. Mills, 726 F. Supp. 293 (D. Kan. 1989). “Shortly after plaintiff was returned to the general population, he was transferred to Iowa State Penitentiary under the provisions of the Interstate Corrections Compact, K.S.A. 76-3001 et seq. Plaintiff was returned to KSP on or about September 26, 1984, and was transferred to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.