77-519.
Pleadings, motions, objections, briefs; service.
(a) The presiding officer, at appropriate stages of the proceedings, shall give all parties full opportunity to file pleadings, objections and motions, including, but not limited to, motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment.
(b) The presiding officer, at appropriate stages of the proceedings, may give all parties full opportunity to file briefs, proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law and proposed initial or final orders.
(c) A party shall serve copies of any filed item on all parties, by mail or any other means, including electronic means, if the party to be served has consented to service by electronic means, prescribed by state agency rule and regulation or by the presiding officer.
History:
L. 1984, ch. 313, § 19; L. 1986, ch. 362, § 5; L. 1995, ch. 175, § 3; L. 2009, ch. 109, § 8; L. 2016, ch. 63, § 2; July 1.
Notes of Decisions
Abbott v. Kansas Bd. of Examiners in Optometry, 1 P.3d 318 (Kan. 2000).
· cites it 4× “The optometrists first argue that the Board's refusal to conduct a hearing before imposing discipline deprived them of due process under the federal and state Constitutions.”
Sheldon v. Kansas Pub. Employees Ret. Sys., 189 P.3d 554 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
“Rather, the hearing officer ruled on KPERS’ motion for summary judgment, a procedure specifically authorized by K.S.A. 77-519(a) of the Kansas Administrative Procedure Act.”
Gamblian v. City of Parsons, 931 P.2d 1238 (Kan. 1997).
“77-518); a discovery process (K.S.A. 77-519; K.S.A. 77-522); and rules of evidence (K.”
— K.S.A. § 77-519(a) — 2 cases
Abbott v. Kansas Bd. of Examiners in Optometry, 1 P.3d 318 (Kan. 2000).
“The optometrists first argue that the Board's refusal to conduct a hearing before imposing discipline deprived them of due process under the federal and state Constitutions.”
Sheldon v. Kansas Pub. Employees Ret. Sys., 189 P.3d 554 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
“Rather, the hearing officer ruled on KPERS’ motion for summary judgment, a procedure specifically authorized by K.S.A. 77-519(a) of the Kansas Administrative Procedure Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.