Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 79-2917 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

79-2917.

History: L. 1885, ch. 199, § 6; R.S. 1923, 79-2917; L. 1937, ch. 359, § 5; L. 1974, ch. 414, § 8; Repealed, L. 2004, ch. 31, § 4; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Presumption that public officers do their duty. Harper v. Conway Springs, 9 Kan. App. 609, 612, 58 P. 488.

2. Section authorizes levy for uncollected state taxes. Harper County v. Cole, 62 Kan. 121, 126, 61 P. 403.

3. Amount to be raised not construed to render levy excessive. Crebbin v. Wever, 71 Kan. 445, 446, 80 P. 977; Railway Co. v. Reno County, 87 Kan. 555, 556, 125 P. 108.

4. Cited in reviewing statutory tax procedure to provide state revenue. Clay County Comm'rs v. French, 139 Kan. 815, 817, 33 P.2d 312.

5. Section does not violate § 1 or § 5 or article 11 of state constitution. Kansas Gas & Elec. Co. v. Dalton, 142 Kan. 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 46 P.2d 27.


Previous | Next

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1982–1982 · leading case: Von Ruden v. Miller, 642 P.2d 91 (Kan. 1982).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Von Ruden v. Miller, 642 P.2d 91 (Kan. 1982). · cites it 2× “Revenues therefrom are used exclusively at the local level. The reduction or elimination of the intangibles tax in one particular county in no way increases the tax burden in any other county.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.