Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 79-3109 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

79-3109.

History: L. 1931, ch. 311, § 2; L. 1931, ch. 312, § 2; L. 1958, ch. 23, § 2 (Special Session); L. 1959, ch. 388, § 1; L. 1970, ch. 390, § 1; L. 1972, ch. 372, § 1; L. 1974, ch. 437, § 1; L. 1975, ch. 500, § 1; L. 1976, ch. 425, § 1; L. 1979, ch. 318, § 1; Repealed, L. 1982, ch. 407, § 5; May 13.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1968–1985 · leading case: Von Ruden v. Miller, 642 P.2d 91 (Kan. 1982).
Von Ruden v. Miller, 642 P.2d 91 (Kan. 1982). · cites it 53× “, a resident of Reno County, was levied a tax of $29 on his intangible property pursuant to K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 79-3109. He filed this action against Annabelle Miller, Reno County Treasurer, challenging the tax.”
Com. Nat'l Bank v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 440 P.2d 634 (Kan. 1968). “) In 1958, the year with which we are presently concerned, § 79-3109 provided, in material part, as follows: “That money, notes and other evidences of debt as hereinbefore defined are hereby separately classified for taxation purposes and shall hereafter be taxed annually at the…”
Cogswell v. Sherman Cnty., 710 P.2d 1331 (Kan. 1985). “In that case, this court determined that the Kansas intangibles tax as authorized under K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 79-3109 was a statewide tax and an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority by the state legislature to local units of government.”
Humpage v. Robards, 625 P.2d 469 (Kan. 1981). · cites it 4× “On March 7, 1979, the trial court issued a restraining order against collection of the taxes but on September 26, 1979, *462 the court dissolved the restraining order and denied appellants’ prayer for the permanent injunction, finding K.S.A. 79-3109 provides for a general tax on…”
In re Angle, 703 P.2d 825 (Kan. 1985). “The City of Wichita, however, eliminated its tax on intangibles for the year 1981 (see K.S.A. 1981 Supp. 79-3109), but Eastborough did not.”
K.S.A. § 79-3109(6): 1 case
Von Ruden v. Miller, 642 P.2d 91 (Kan. 1982). “, a resident of Reno County, was levied a tax of $29 on his intangible property pursuant to K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 79-3109. He filed this action against Annabelle Miller, Reno County Treasurer, challenging the tax.”
K.S.A. § 79-3109(a): 2 cases
Von Ruden v. Miller, 642 P.2d 91 (Kan. 1982). “, a resident of Reno County, was levied a tax of $29 on his intangible property pursuant to K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 79-3109. He filed this action against Annabelle Miller, Reno County Treasurer, challenging the tax.”
Humpage v. Robards, 625 P.2d 469 (Kan. 1981). “On March 7, 1979, the trial court issued a restraining order against collection of the taxes but on September 26, 1979, *462 the court dissolved the restraining order and denied appellants’ prayer for the permanent injunction, finding K.S.A. 79-3109 provides for a general tax on…”
K.S.A. § 79-3109(b): 2 cases
Von Ruden v. Miller, 642 P.2d 91 (Kan. 1982). “, a resident of Reno County, was levied a tax of $29 on his intangible property pursuant to K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 79-3109. He filed this action against Annabelle Miller, Reno County Treasurer, challenging the tax.”
Humpage v. Robards, 625 P.2d 469 (Kan. 1981). “On March 7, 1979, the trial court issued a restraining order against collection of the taxes but on September 26, 1979, *462 the court dissolved the restraining order and denied appellants’ prayer for the permanent injunction, finding K.S.A. 79-3109 provides for a general tax on…”
K.S.A. § 79-3109(h): 1 case
Von Ruden v. Miller, 642 P.2d 91 (Kan. 1982). “, a resident of Reno County, was levied a tax of $29 on his intangible property pursuant to K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 79-3109. He filed this action against Annabelle Miller, Reno County Treasurer, challenging the tax.”
K.S.A. § 79-3109(o): 1 case
Von Ruden v. Miller, 642 P.2d 91 (Kan. 1982). “, a resident of Reno County, was levied a tax of $29 on his intangible property pursuant to K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 79-3109. He filed this action against Annabelle Miller, Reno County Treasurer, challenging the tax.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.