History:
L. 1937, ch. 283, § 10; Repealed, L. 1974, ch. 33, § 8-2205; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Stop sign defectively installed on side of state highway constituted "defect" under K.S.A. 68-419; liability. Brown v. State Highway Commission, 202 Kan. 1, 2, 8, 13, 444 P.2d 882.
2. Cited; manual adopted hereunder for purpose of making uniform a system of traffic control devices. Martin v. State Highway Commission, 213 Kan. 877, 882, 884, 518 P.2d 437.
3. K.A.R. 36-10-1 providing for adoption of manual pursuant to this section applied; effect of law; duty of company to erect signs on both sides of track. Waits v. St. Louis-San Francisco Rly. Co., 216 Kan. 160, 173, 175, 176, 531 P.2d 22.
Waits v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 531 P.2d 22 (Kan. 1975). · cites it 5דThe regulation, *173 authorized by K.S.A. 8-510 (repealed L. 1974, ch. 33, § 8-2205) provided for the adoption by the State Highway Commission of the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways".”
Martin v. State High. Comm'n, 518 P.2d 437 (Kan. 1974). · cites it 2דState Highway Commission, supra, held that under K.S.A. 8-510 the commission was under a legislative mandate to adopt a manual containing specifications for traffic-control devices.”
Brown v. State High. Comm'n, 444 P.2d 882 (Kan. 1968). “8-511 the duty is imposed upon the State Highway Commission to maintain traffic control devices upon all state highways in conformity to its Manual and specifications which have the force and effect of law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.