History:
L. 1937, ch. 283, § 48; Repealed, L. 1938, ch. 58, § 7; March 8.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Cited; special findings absolved defendant of violating K.S.A. 8-547(c) notwithstanding general verdict. Strimple v. O. K. Warehouse Co., 151 Kan. 98, 104, 98 P.2d 169.
2. Repeal hereof did not repeal all provisions authorizing use of mechanical signals. Curtiss v. Fahle, 157 Kan. 226, 233, 139 P.2d 827.
In the Interest of S.R.C.-Q., 367 P.3d 1276 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2ד] § 8-548, the above terms of the ICPC apply to placement ‘with parents and relatives’ and non-agency guardians, except when a parent or relative also is requesting tire placement under certain circumstances.”
In re S.R.C.-Q. – Powell (Kan. Ct. App. 2016). “] § 8-548, the above terms of the ICPC apply to placement 'with parents and relatives' and non-agency guardians, except when a parent or relative also is requesting the placement under certain circumstances.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.