Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 119.030 (2026)

Repealed, 1974

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Unexpired terms -- Nominations for. History: Repealed 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 130, sec. 198. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 1550-4.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1946–1959 · leading case: Borders v. Collingsworth, 251 S.W.2d 463 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952).
Borders v. Collingsworth, 251 S.W.2d 463 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952). · cites it 2× “) Borders argues that the ballots in the 10 precincts violated the requirement of KRS 119.030 that “candidates for full terms shall be grouped together, and candidates for unexpired terms shall be grouped together, under appropriate headings, so that the voter may easily…”
Brumleve v. Ruth, 195 S.W.2d 777 (Ky. Ct. App. 1946). “By virtue of the statute, KRS 119.030, nominations must be made at a primary election.”
Wallace v. Cash, 328 S.W.2d 516 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959). “His death having occurred less than 70 days before the 1959 primary election held on May 26, 1959, KRS 119.030 authorized the “governing authority” of the Republican party to select a nominee to be voted on at the 1959 general election to fill the vacancy caused by Henderson’s…”
Davidson v. White, 210 S.W.2d 943 (Ky. Ct. App. 1948). · cites it 2× “The first ground relied on by appellant is that, although appellee was running for an unexpired term, he declared for a full term, and his name was printed on the official Primary ballot as a candidate for a full term, contrary to the provisions of KRS 119.030. The next, ground…”
Duncan v. Queenan, 259 S.W.2d 60 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953). ““Certificates of nomination made by the governing authority of a party to fill vacancies, in office, as provided in KRS 119.030, shall, when required to be filed with the Secretary of State, be filed not less than ■ fifty-five days before the day fixed 'by law for the election…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.