Kentucky Revised Statutes
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 125.040 (2026)
Repealed, 1974
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Catchline at repeal: Specifications machines must comply with. History: Repealed 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 130, sec. 198, effective June 21, 1974. -- Created 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 181, sec. 4.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1962–1969 · leading case: Ford v. Cnty. of Carlisle, 361 S.W.2d 757 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962).
Ford v. Cnty. of Carlisle, 361 S.W.2d 757 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962). “The statute, KRS 125.040, contains specific provisions concerning locks.”
Mann v. Cornett, 445 S.W.2d 853 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). “KRS 125.040 (3)is the appropriate statutory reference as is made obvious from the text of KRS 118.”
Lackey v. Garner, 367 S.W.2d 257 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963). “450(4) which reads as follows: “Each county shall acquire voting machines meeting the specification of Section 125.040 of the Kentucky Revised Statutes, for each precinct in which such machines are not already in use, no later than the primary election in 1963; provided,…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 125.040(10) — 1 case
Ford v. Cnty. of Carlisle, 361 S.W.2d 757 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962). “The statute, KRS 125.040, contains specific provisions concerning locks.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 125.040(2) — 1 case
Ford v. Cnty. of Carlisle, 361 S.W.2d 757 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962). “The statute, KRS 125.040, contains specific provisions concerning locks.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 125.040(3) — 1 case
Mann v. Cornett, 445 S.W.2d 853 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). “KRS 125.040 (3)is the appropriate statutory reference as is made obvious from the text of KRS 118.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.