Catchline at repeal: Sheriff's annual settlement with county -- Objections -- Action in
Circuit Court -- Statement of funds and expenditures -- Settlement for excess fees --
Applicability of KRS 64.368 if population decreases below 70,000.
History: Repealed 2009 Ky. Acts ch. 10, sec. 71, effective January 1, 2010. --
Amended 2005 Ky. Acts ch. 85, sec. 261, effective June 20, 2005. -- Amended 2002
Ky. Acts ch. 71, sec. 8, effective July 15, 2002. -- Amended 1998 Ky. Acts ch. 209,
sec. 4, effective March 30, 1998. -- Amended 1992 Ky. Acts ch. 220, sec. 11,
effective January 1, 1994. -- Repealed and reenacted 1990 Ky. Acts ch. 476, Pt. V,
sec. 347, effective July 13, 1990. -- Amended 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 8, sec. 1, effective
July 15, 1982. -- Amended 1978 Ky. Acts ch. 384, sec. 279, effective June 17, 1978.
-- Amended 1976 (1st Extra. Sess.) Ky. Acts ch. 14, sec. 148, effective January 2,
1978. -- Amended 1966 Ky. Acts ch. 239, sec. 137. -- Amended 1954 Ky. Acts ch.
179, sec. 2. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942,
from Ky. Stat. sec. 932, 1884, 4146, 4251.
Notes of Decisions
Bd. of Educ. v. Greenhill, 291 S.W.2d 36 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956).
· cites it 2× “He arrived at that percentage by applying the provisions of the 1954 amendments to KRS 134.310. The trial court entered judgment for $2,621.”
Hogg's Adm'r v. Commonwealth, 192 S.W.2d 487 (Ky. Ct. App. 1946).
· cites it 3× “KRS 134.310. There-was kept in the county court clerk’s office special tax books for entry from time to time of omitted assessments-discovered during the course of the year.”
Grant Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Foree, 303 S.W.2d 291 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957).
· cites it 2× “Actually, although the trial judge made findings of fact on the items above mentioned, he did not base his allowance on those findings, but upon the theory that subsection (6) of KRS 134.310 was valid, and under that subsection the sheriff would have been entitled to a larger…”
Thomas v. McCreary Cnty., 239 S.W.2d 942 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951).
· cites it 3× “In his appeal Thomas seeks to avoid payment of the judgment on the grounds (1) that the action is barred by limitation because no notice of his alleged default was given to the sureties within the period of one year from the end of the year in which *944 the-bond sued on was…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.