The candidate names shall be presented to the voters in the form prescribed by the general
election law, except that no party emblem or distinguishing mark shall be used, save the
words "School Candidates." The order in which the names of the candidates are to appear
shall be determined by lot. As many additional spaces shall be left blank as there are
members to be elected from the district or division as the case may be.
Effective: July 13, 1990
History: Repealed and reenacted 1990 Ky. Acts ch. 476, Pt. V, sec. 427, effective July
13, 1990. -- Amended 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 360, sec. 46, effective July 15, 1982. --
Amended 1962 Ky. Acts ch. 88, sec. 3. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1,
effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 4399-25.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases, 1943–1985 · leading case:
Roberts v. Byrd, 344 S.W.2d 378 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961).
Roberts v. Byrd, 344 S.W.2d 378 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961).
· cites it 5× “Both contests were based upon the ground that the county clerk neglected to rotate the names each fifty ballots as provided by KRS 160.230. Byrd and Isaacs admitted that no rotation had taken place but claimed that such omission did not void the election.”
Grauman, Co. Atty. v. Jefferson Co. Fiscal Court, 171 S.W.2d 36 (Ky. Ct. App. 1943).
· cites it 3× “The answer to the argument that the use of voting machines makes it impossible to rotate the names of candidates on the ballot for membership on the board of education on each fiftieth ballot as provided in KRS 160.230, is that Section 147 of our Constitution as amended…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.