ad litem.
(1) The following persons shall be made parties defendant in an action for leave to adopt a child:
(a) The child to be adopted;
(b) The biological living parents of a child under eighteen (18), if the child is born in lawful wedlock. If the child is born out of wedlock, its mother; and its father, if one (1) of the following requirements is met:
1. He is known and voluntarily identified by the mother by affidavit;
2. He has registered with the cabinet pursuant to KRS 199.503 as a putative father prior to the birth of the child, or if he did not have notice prior to the birth of the child, within twenty-one (21) days after the birth of the child;
3. He has caused his name to be affixed to the birth certificate of the child;
4. He has commenced a judicial proceeding claiming parental right;
5. He has contributed financially to the support of the child, either by paying the medical or hospital bills associated with the birth of the child or financially contributed to the child's support; or
6. He has married the mother of the child or has lived openly or is living openly with the child or the person designated on the birth certificate as the biological mother of the child. A putative father shall not be made a party defendant if none of the requirements set forth above have been met, and a biological parent shall not be made a party defendant if the parental rights of that parent have been terminated under KRS Chapter 625, or under a comparable statute of another jurisdiction;
(c) The child's guardian, if it has one.
(d) If the care, custody, and control of the child has been transferred to the cabinet, or any other individual or individuals, institution, or agency, then the cabinet, the other individual or individuals, institution, or agency shall be named a party defendant, unless the individual or individuals, or the institution or agency is also the petitioner.
(2) Each party defendant shall be brought before the court in the same manner as provided in other civil cases except that if the child to be adopted is under fourteen (14) years of age and the cabinet, individual, institution, or agency has custody of the child, the service of process upon the child shall be had by serving a copy of the summons in the action upon the cabinet, individual, institution or agency, any provision of CR 4.04(3) to the contrary notwithstanding.
(3) If the child's biological living parents, if the child is born in lawful wedlock, or if the child is born out of wedlock, its mother, and if paternity is established in legal action or if an affidavit is filed stating that the affiant is father of the child, its father, are parties defendant, no guardian ad litem need be appointed to represent the child to be adopted. Effective:June 27, 2019 History: Amended 2019 Ky. Acts ch. 33, sec. 3, effective June 27, 2019. -- Amended 2018 Ky. Acts ch. 159, sec. 30, effective July 14, 2018. -- Amended 1994 Ky. Acts ch. 242, sec. 4, effective July 15, 1994. -- Amended 1986 Ky. Acts ch. 423, sec. 188, effective July 1, 1987. -- Amended 1984 Ky. Acts ch. 16, sec. 3, effective July 13, 1984. -- Amended 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 188, sec. 183, effective July 15, 1980. -- Amended 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 51, sec. 1; and ch. 386, sec. 35. -- Amended 1962 Ky. Acts ch. 210, sec. 27; and ch. 211, sec. 4. -- Created 1950 Ky. Acts ch. 125, sec. 11. Legislative Research Commission Note: This section was amended by 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 280, sec. 145, which was to have become effective July 1, 1982. Thereafter, 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 284 changed the effective date of that act to July 15, 1984. Then, 1984 Ky. Acts ch. 184 repealed both 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 280, and 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 284.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
13
cases (
3 in the last 5 years), 1975–2025 · leading case:
Moore v. Asente, 110 S.W.3d 336 (Ky. 2003).
Moore v. Asente, 110 S.W.3d 336 (Ky. 2003).
· cites it 10× “[37] KRS 199.480(1)(b). [38] KRS 199.500(1). [39] KRS 199.”
C.J. v. M.S., 572 S.W.3d 492 (Ky. Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 6× “Next, we must determine whether Adoptive Parents complied with KRS 199.480, which governs party defendants, service of process, and guardian ad litem.”
Wright v. Howard, 711 S.W.2d 492 (Ky. Ct. App. 1986).
· cites it 5× “Under this mistaken approach most of the adoption statute requirements with which the Howard’s have not strictly complied are part of or centered about KRS 199.480 titled “Parties defendant in an adoption proceeding-Process-Guardian ad Litem.”
E.K. v. T.A., 572 S.W.3d 80 (Ky. Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 4× “Furthermore, KRS 199.480 lists all party defendants required in an adoption.”
A.F. v. L.B., 572 S.W.3d 64 (Ky. Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 2× “480(1)(b)(6), the biological parent or parents must be made a party defendant to the proceeding, KRS 199.480(1)(b), and a trial court may approve an adoption without the consent of the child's biological living parents only if the evidence supports the additional factual…”
Goldfuss v. Goldfuss, 565 S.W.2d 441 (Ky. 1978).
· cites it 2× “Ill KRS 199.480 provides in pertinent part: “The following persons shall be made parties defendant in an action for leave to adopt a child: [[Image here]] (b) The natural living parent of a child under eighteen (18), if the child is legitimate, .”
S.B.P. v. R.L., 567 S.W.3d 142 (Ky. Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 3× “KRS 199.480(1) specifies: (1) The following persons shall be made parties defendant in an action for leave to adopt a child: (a) The child to be adopted; (b) The biological living parents of a child under eighteen (18), if the child is born in lawful wedlock.”
Pierce v. Pierce, 522 S.W.2d 435 (Ky. Ct. App. 1975).
· cites it 2× “KRS 199.480(2) provides, in pertinent part, that "Each party defendant shall be brought before the court in the same manner as provided in other civil cases * * *.”
S.J.L.S. v. T.L.S., 265 S.W.3d 804 (Ky. Ct. App. 2008).
“KRS 199.480(3). Nevertheless, simultaneous with the filing of the Petition, Zeller tendered a motion and proposed order seeking such an appointment.”
M.S.S. v. J.E.B. (Ky. 2022).
· cites it 2× “” And KRS 199.480, which lists all parties defendant required in an adoption, states that the Cabinet is only required to be a party defendant “if the care, custody, and control of the child has been transferred to the [C]abinet .”
Sjls v. Tls, 265 S.W.3d 804 (Ky. Ct. App. 2008).
“KRS 199.480(3). Nevertheless, simultaneous with the filing of the Petition, Zeller tendered a motion and proposed order seeking such an appointment.”
K.D.Y. v. W.F. (Ky. Ct. App. 2025).
“KRS 199.480 governs the parties who shall be made defendants in an adoption proceeding and service thereof.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.480(1) — 2 cases
C.J. v. M.S., 572 S.W.3d 492 (Ky. Ct. App. 2019).
“Next, we must determine whether Adoptive Parents complied with KRS 199.480, which governs party defendants, service of process, and guardian ad litem.”
S.B.P. v. R.L., 567 S.W.3d 142 (Ky. Ct. App. 2018).
“KRS 199.480(1) specifies: (1) The following persons shall be made parties defendant in an action for leave to adopt a child: (a) The child to be adopted; (b) The biological living parents of a child under eighteen (18), if the child is born in lawful wedlock.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.480(1)(a) — 1 case
S.B.P. v. R.L., 567 S.W.3d 142 (Ky. Ct. App. 2018).
“KRS 199.480(1) specifies: (1) The following persons shall be made parties defendant in an action for leave to adopt a child: (a) The child to be adopted; (b) The biological living parents of a child under eighteen (18), if the child is born in lawful wedlock.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.480(1)(b) — 3 cases
Moore v. Asente, 110 S.W.3d 336 (Ky. 2003).
“[37] KRS 199.480(1)(b). [38] KRS 199.500(1). [39] KRS 199.”
A.F. v. L.B., 572 S.W.3d 64 (Ky. Ct. App. 2019).
“480(1)(b)(6), the biological parent or parents must be made a party defendant to the proceeding, KRS 199.480(1)(b), and a trial court may approve an adoption without the consent of the child's biological living parents only if the evidence supports the additional factual…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.480(1)(b)(6) — 2 cases
Moore v. Asente, 110 S.W.3d 336 (Ky. 2003).
“[37] KRS 199.480(1)(b). [38] KRS 199.500(1). [39] KRS 199.”
A.F. v. L.B., 572 S.W.3d 64 (Ky. Ct. App. 2019).
“480(1)(b)(6), the biological parent or parents must be made a party defendant to the proceeding, KRS 199.480(1)(b), and a trial court may approve an adoption without the consent of the child's biological living parents only if the evidence supports the additional factual…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.480(1)(d) — 2 cases
C.J. v. M.S., 572 S.W.3d 492 (Ky. Ct. App. 2019).
“Next, we must determine whether Adoptive Parents complied with KRS 199.480, which governs party defendants, service of process, and guardian ad litem.”
M.S.S. v. J.E.B. (Ky. 2022).
“” And KRS 199.480, which lists all parties defendant required in an adoption, states that the Cabinet is only required to be a party defendant “if the care, custody, and control of the child has been transferred to the [C]abinet .”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.480(2) — 5 cases
Moore v. Asente, 110 S.W.3d 336 (Ky. 2003).
“[37] KRS 199.480(1)(b). [38] KRS 199.500(1). [39] KRS 199.”
C.J. v. M.S., 572 S.W.3d 492 (Ky. Ct. App. 2019).
“Next, we must determine whether Adoptive Parents complied with KRS 199.480, which governs party defendants, service of process, and guardian ad litem.”
Wright v. Howard, 711 S.W.2d 492 (Ky. Ct. App. 1986).
“Under this mistaken approach most of the adoption statute requirements with which the Howard’s have not strictly complied are part of or centered about KRS 199.480 titled “Parties defendant in an adoption proceeding-Process-Guardian ad Litem.”
Pierce v. Pierce, 522 S.W.2d 435 (Ky. Ct. App. 1975).
“KRS 199.480(2) provides, in pertinent part, that "Each party defendant shall be brought before the court in the same manner as provided in other civil cases * * *.”
Goldfuss v. Goldfuss, 565 S.W.2d 441 (Ky. 1978).
“Ill KRS 199.480 provides in pertinent part: “The following persons shall be made parties defendant in an action for leave to adopt a child: [[Image here]] (b) The natural living parent of a child under eighteen (18), if the child is legitimate, .”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.480(3) — 5 cases
C.J. v. M.S., 572 S.W.3d 492 (Ky. Ct. App. 2019).
“Next, we must determine whether Adoptive Parents complied with KRS 199.480, which governs party defendants, service of process, and guardian ad litem.”
Wright v. Howard, 711 S.W.2d 492 (Ky. Ct. App. 1986).
“Under this mistaken approach most of the adoption statute requirements with which the Howard’s have not strictly complied are part of or centered about KRS 199.480 titled “Parties defendant in an adoption proceeding-Process-Guardian ad Litem.”
S.J.L.S. v. T.L.S., 265 S.W.3d 804 (Ky. Ct. App. 2008).
“KRS 199.480(3). Nevertheless, simultaneous with the filing of the Petition, Zeller tendered a motion and proposed order seeking such an appointment.”
S.B.P. v. R.L., 567 S.W.3d 142 (Ky. Ct. App. 2018).
“KRS 199.480(1) specifies: (1) The following persons shall be made parties defendant in an action for leave to adopt a child: (a) The child to be adopted; (b) The biological living parents of a child under eighteen (18), if the child is born in lawful wedlock.”
Sjls v. Tls, 265 S.W.3d 804 (Ky. Ct. App. 2008).
“KRS 199.480(3). Nevertheless, simultaneous with the filing of the Petition, Zeller tendered a motion and proposed order seeking such an appointment.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.480(l)(a) — 1 case
Wright v. Howard, 711 S.W.2d 492 (Ky. Ct. App. 1986).
“Under this mistaken approach most of the adoption statute requirements with which the Howard’s have not strictly complied are part of or centered about KRS 199.480 titled “Parties defendant in an adoption proceeding-Process-Guardian ad Litem.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.480(l)(b) — 2 cases
Moore v. Asente, 110 S.W.3d 336 (Ky. 2003).
“[37] KRS 199.480(1)(b). [38] KRS 199.500(1). [39] KRS 199.”
Wright v. Howard, 711 S.W.2d 492 (Ky. Ct. App. 1986).
“Under this mistaken approach most of the adoption statute requirements with which the Howard’s have not strictly complied are part of or centered about KRS 199.480 titled “Parties defendant in an adoption proceeding-Process-Guardian ad Litem.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.480(l)(b)(6) — 1 case
Moore v. Asente, 110 S.W.3d 336 (Ky. 2003).
“[37] KRS 199.480(1)(b). [38] KRS 199.500(1). [39] KRS 199.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.