Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 21
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 21.060 (2026)

Repealed, 1976

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Appellate civil jurisdiciton of Court of Appeals. History: Repealed 1976 Ky. Acts ch. 67, sec. 14, effective March 23, 1976. -- Amended 1952 Ky. Acts ch. 24, sec. 1. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 950-1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 130 cases, 1942–2005 · leading case: Newell Enter., Inc. v. Bowling, 158 S.W.3d 750 (Ky. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Newell Enter., Inc. v. Bowling, 158 S.W.3d 750 (Ky. 2005). · cites it 5× “208, § 1 (re-enacting KS 950-1 as KRS 21.060); 1952 Ky. Acts ch. 24, § 1 ("Appeals may be taken to the Court of Appeals as a matter of right from all final orders and judgments of circuit courts in civil cases ex *756 cept: .”
Miller v. Vettiner, 481 S.W.2d 32 (Ky. Ct. App. 1972). · cites it 3× “KRS 21.060(1) (c) excepts (from the right of appeal) judgments punishing contempts, but it was held in Levisa Stone Corp.”
Levisa Stone Corp. v. Hays, 429 S.W.2d 413 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968). · cites it 4× “the judgment before us arises out of civil contempt, it is unnecessary for us to reconsider the soundness of the above three opinions, although we are inclined to the view that with respect to criminal con-tempts the statute means what it says 2 and that the only proper avenue…”
Self v. Self, 168 S.W.2d 743 (Ky. Ct. App. 1943). · cites it 4× “She realizes that under Section 21.060, KRS no appeal will lie to this court from a judgment granting a divorce.”
McLean v. Thurman, 273 S.W.2d 825 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954). · cites it 2× “Insofar as pertinent here, KRS 21.060, prior to 1952, permitted parties to take an appeal to this court, as a matter of right, from all judgments in civil cases except “(a) Judgments for the recovery of money or personal property, or any interest therein, or to enforce any lien…”
Kentucky Cent. Life Ins. Co. v. Combs, 432 S.W.2d 415 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968). · cites it 2× “KRS 21.060(2). Appellant insists that it was entitled to a directed verdict because of false material answers to certain questions in the application for insurance.”
Webster Cnty. Soil Conservation Dist. v. Shelton, 437 S.W.2d 934 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 2× “” KRS 21.060. (Emphasis ours.) In the interest of expediting litigation and possibly to prevent piecemeal appeals, this court has adopted CR 54.”
Arnett v. Meade, 462 S.W.2d 940 (Ky. Ct. App. 1971). “We do not find it necessary at this time to decide whether that review may be obtained by appeal, on the theory that the bar of KRS 21.060(1) (c) against appeals from judgments punishing contempts was predicated upon the existence of statutory limits on the extent of such…”
Lebus v. Lebus, 382 S.W.2d 873 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). · cites it 2× “) Appellee contends the appeal from the order allowing maintenance should be dismissed on the ground that an insufficient jurisdictional amount is involved.”
Rutherford v. Modern Bakery, 310 S.W.2d 274 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958). · cites it 2× “The appellee contends that (1) we do not have jurisdiction of the case under KRS 21.060 because the judgment and the evidence fail to establish the amount in controversy as exceeding $2,500; and (2) if we do have jurisdiction, the judgment should be affirmed because the…”
Toms v. Holmes, 171 S.W.2d 245 (Ky. Ct. App. 1943). · cites it 2× “We, therefore, conclude that, since the only issue-formed by the pleadings was the title to the land in contest we have jurisdiction of this appeal under the provisions of section 21.060, KES, section 950-1 of Baldwin’s 1936 Edition of Carroll’s Kentucky Statutes, and which…”
Sharp v. Sharp, 491 S.W.2d 639 (Ky. Ct. App. 1973). “She relies on KRS 21.060(1) (b) and our decisions that “an appeal does not lie from an award of an absolute divorce.”
Show all 130 citing cases →
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 21.060(1) — 16 cases
Miller v. Vettiner, 481 S.W.2d 32 (Ky. Ct. App. 1972). “KRS 21.060(1) (c) excepts (from the right of appeal) judgments punishing contempts, but it was held in Levisa Stone Corp.”
Levisa Stone Corp. v. Hays, 429 S.W.2d 413 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968). “the judgment before us arises out of civil contempt, it is unnecessary for us to reconsider the soundness of the above three opinions, although we are inclined to the view that with respect to criminal con-tempts the statute means what it says 2 and that the only proper avenue…”
Arnett v. Meade, 462 S.W.2d 940 (Ky. Ct. App. 1971). “We do not find it necessary at this time to decide whether that review may be obtained by appeal, on the theory that the bar of KRS 21.060(1) (c) against appeals from judgments punishing contempts was predicated upon the existence of statutory limits on the extent of such…”
Sharp v. Sharp, 491 S.W.2d 639 (Ky. Ct. App. 1973). “She relies on KRS 21.060(1) (b) and our decisions that “an appeal does not lie from an award of an absolute divorce.”
Rowley v. Lampe, 331 S.W.2d 887 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 21.060(1)(c) — 1 case
Newell Enter., Inc. v. Bowling, 158 S.W.3d 750 (Ky. 2005). “208, § 1 (re-enacting KS 950-1 as KRS 21.060); 1952 Ky. Acts ch. 24, § 1 ("Appeals may be taken to the Court of Appeals as a matter of right from all final orders and judgments of circuit courts in civil cases ex *756 cept: .”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 21.060(2) — 7 cases
Kentucky Cent. Life Ins. Co. v. Combs, 432 S.W.2d 415 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968). “KRS 21.060(2). Appellant insists that it was entitled to a directed verdict because of false material answers to certain questions in the application for insurance.”
Commonwealth, Dep't of Highways v. Brubaker, 375 S.W.2d 404 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964).
City of Covington v. Crolley, 206 S.W.2d 933 (Ky. Ct. App. 1947).
Polsgrove v. Commissioners of Sinking Fund of City of Louisville, 411 S.W.2d 32 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967).
Lupino Realty Co. v. Sholdar, 258 S.W.2d 702 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 21.060(b) — 6 cases
Hinton v. Hinton, 377 S.W.2d 888 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964).
Cooper v. Cooper, 234 S.W.2d 658 (Ky. Ct. App. 1950).
Cooper v. Cooper, 234 S.W.2d 658 (Ky. Ct. App. 1950).
Goetz v. Goetz, 341 S.W.2d 249 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960).
Polsgrove v. Commissioners of Sinking Fund of City of Louisville, 411 S.W.2d 32 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.