Kentucky Revised Statutes
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 218A.1444 (2026)
Controlled substance endangerment to a child in the fourth degree --
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Penalty.
(1) A person is guilty of controlled substance endangerment to a child in the fourth degree when he or she knowingly causes or permits a child to be present when any person is illegally manufacturing a controlled substance or methamphetamine or possesses a hazardous chemical substance with intent to illegally manufacture a controlled substance or methamphetamine under circumstances that place a child in danger of serious physical injury or death, if the child is not injured as a result of the commission of the offense.
(2) Controlled substance endangerment to a child in the fourth degree is a Class D felony. Effective: June 20, 2005 History: Created 2005 Ky. Acts ch. 150, sec. 5, effective June 20, 2005.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2012–2014 · leading case: Sevier v. Commonwealth, 434 S.W.3d 443 (Ky. 2014).
Sevier v. Commonwealth, 434 S.W.3d 443 (Ky. 2014). “A parental, custodial, or special relationship with a child is not a prerequisite to criminal liability under KRS 218A.1444. The fourth-degree controlled-substance-endangerment-of-a-child statute 29 contains no explicit requirement that the party subjecting a child to the…”
Commonwealth v. Pridham, 394 S.W.3d 867 (Ky. 2012). “1432); with complicity to commit unlawful distribution of a methamphetamine precursor, a class D felony (KRS 218A.1438); and, because one of the other passengers in the vehicle with Pridham when he was stopped was a minor, with fourth-degree controlled substance endangerment to…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 218A.1444(1) — 1 case
Sevier v. Commonwealth, 434 S.W.3d 443 (Ky. 2014). “A parental, custodial, or special relationship with a child is not a prerequisite to criminal liability under KRS 218A.1444. The fourth-degree controlled-substance-endangerment-of-a-child statute 29 contains no explicit requirement that the party subjecting a child to the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.