Catchline at repeal: Terms of court.
History: Repealed 1962 Ky. Acts ch. 201, sec. 2. -- Amended 1962 Ky. Acts ch. 54, sec.
1; ch. 237, sec. 1; ch. 247, sec. 1; ch. 270, sec. 8; ch. 274, sec. 1; and ch. 277, sec. 1.
-- Amended 1960 Ky. Acts ch. 39, secs. 5 and 6; ch. 70, sec. 1; ch. 170, sec. 5; ch.
190, sec. 1; ch. 201, sec. 1; and ch. 230, sec. 1. -- Amended 1958 Ky. Acts ch. 29,
sec. 1; ch. 74, sec. 1; ch. 87, sec. 1; and ch. 88, sec. 1. -- Amended 1956 Ky. Acts
(4th Extra. Sess.) ch. 8, secs. 1 and 2. -- Amended 1956 Ky. Acts (1st Extra. Sess.)
ch. 2, sec. 2. -- Amended 1956 Ky. Acts ch. 44, sec. 1; ch. 55, sec. 1; ch. 59, secs. 6,
7, and 8; and ch. 83, sec. 1; -- Amended 1954 Ky. Acts ch. 71, secs. 3 and 5; ch. 93,
sec. 1; ch. 116, sec. 9; ch. 128, sec. 1; and ch. 210, sec. 1. -- Amended 1952 Ky. Acts
ch. 3, sec. 1; ch. 7, sec. 1; ch. 13, sec. 1; ch. 22, sec. 1; ch. 91, sec. 1; ch. 100, sec. 1;
ch. 105, sec. 1; and ch. 142, sec. 1. -- Amended 1950 Ky. Acts ch. 143, sec. 5; ch.
178, sec. 5; and ch. 200, sec. 1. -- Amended 1948 Ky. Acts ch. 7, sec. 1; ch. 209, sec.
5; and ch. 212, sec. 5. -- Amended 1946 Ky. Acts ch. 32, sec. 1; ch 59, sec. 1; ch.
105, sec. 1; and ch. 108, sec. 1. -- Amended 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 29, sec. 1; ch. 38,
secs. 1 and 2; ch. 187, secs. 1 and 2; ch. 191, secs. 1 and 2; ch. 194, secs. 1 and 2. --
Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat.
secs. 965 to 965-38.
Notes of Decisions
Woods v. Commonwealth, 305 S.W.2d 935 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957).
“KRS 23.050. On the day of the trial, the employed counsel for appellant withdrew from the case.”
Harrod v. Commonwealth, 253 S.W.2d 574 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952).
“KRS 23.050 (30). Chapter 24 of the Statutes relates to courts of continuous session.”
Brock v. Turner Fuel Co., 178 S.W.2d 427 (Ky. Ct. App. 1944).
· cites it 2× “In addition to the denial made by the sheriff and his chief deputies in support of defendant’s amended answer alleging such denial, we have the fact that plaintiff’s counsel never took any steps for a period of six months against the sheriff to show cause why he had not served…”
Mahan v. Commonwealth, 286 S.W.2d 93 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955).
“KRS 23.050(1). Where terms of court are intermittent sometimes unusual delay results, but we are aware of no case in this jurisdiction holding such delay is a ground for reversal of a judgment.”
Jewell v. City of Lake Louisvilla, 339 S.W.2d 169 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960).
“It is our conclusion that a regular term as used in the act means the term fixed by the legislature to begin on a day certain and continue during a specific period of time as now provided by KRS 23.050. The trial court being without jurisdiction of the subject matter the action…”
Beach v. Lady, 262 S.W.2d 837 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953).
“Under KRS 23.050(26) circuit court convenes in Harlan County on the first Monday in April and continues for eighteen juridical days.”
Palmer v. Palmer, 174 S.W.2d 711 (Ky. Ct. App. 1943).
“Statutes, section 965-8, KRS 23.050(8). Finally it is contended by the appellee that since the appellant is claiming that the supplemental judgment, or modification, from which the appeal is taken is void, the appeal should be dismissed because no motion to set aside such void…”
Hardy v. Commonwealth, 336 S.W.2d 338 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960).
“KRS 23.050(23). By order of the Estill Circuit Court the May term was extended 24 juridical days beginning June 15 and ending July 11, overlapping the Lee Circuit Court term.”
Burris v. Burris, 341 S.W.2d 265 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960).
“mental faculty of persons, except that when no circuit court is in session in the county, inquests of insane persons may be held by a circuit judge or by the county court.”
Hall v. Commonwealth, 259 S.W.2d 57 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953).
“KRS 23.050(37). Prior to the amendment, the-statute authorized six terms of court in the county, one of which was to commence on the fourth Monday in August.”
Marcum v. Moore, 263 S.W.2d 89 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953).
“See editor’s note to KRS 23.050(39), 1948 edition. Hon. W. R. Prater, at the time this new 39th district was created, was judge of the 36th district which included Breathitt County.”
Brumagen v. Hammons, 263 S.W.2d 115 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953).
“KRS 23.050 (22). Appellants contend that since they were seeking to recover for rent (amounting to about $4,500 at time of filing petition for revivor) the action involved not only recovery of the land but duties of the adminis-tratrix as well.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 23.050(1) — 1 case
Mahan v. Commonwealth, 286 S.W.2d 93 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955).
“KRS 23.050(1). Where terms of court are intermittent sometimes unusual delay results, but we are aware of no case in this jurisdiction holding such delay is a ground for reversal of a judgment.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 23.050(23) — 1 case
Hardy v. Commonwealth, 336 S.W.2d 338 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960).
“KRS 23.050(23). By order of the Estill Circuit Court the May term was extended 24 juridical days beginning June 15 and ending July 11, overlapping the Lee Circuit Court term.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 23.050(26) — 1 case
Beach v. Lady, 262 S.W.2d 837 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953).
“Under KRS 23.050(26) circuit court convenes in Harlan County on the first Monday in April and continues for eighteen juridical days.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 23.050(37) — 1 case
Hall v. Commonwealth, 259 S.W.2d 57 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953).
“KRS 23.050(37). Prior to the amendment, the-statute authorized six terms of court in the county, one of which was to commence on the fourth Monday in August.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 23.050(39) — 1 case
Marcum v. Moore, 263 S.W.2d 89 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953).
“See editor’s note to KRS 23.050(39), 1948 edition. Hon. W. R. Prater, at the time this new 39th district was created, was judge of the 36th district which included Breathitt County.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 23.050(8) — 1 case
Palmer v. Palmer, 174 S.W.2d 711 (Ky. Ct. App. 1943).
“Statutes, section 965-8, KRS 23.050(8). Finally it is contended by the appellee that since the appellant is claiming that the supplemental judgment, or modification, from which the appeal is taken is void, the appeal should be dismissed because no motion to set aside such void…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.