Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 25.180 (2026)

Repealed, 1978

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Evidence -- How produced -- Allowances to be supported by facts. History: Repealed 1976 (1st Extra. Sess.) Ky. Acts ch. 14, sec. 491, effective January 2, 1978. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 1062, 1063, 1064.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1951–1969 · leading case: Smith v. Shamburger, 238 S.W.2d 844 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Smith v. Shamburger, 238 S.W.2d 844 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951). “” On this last date, the County Court overruled all of petitioner’s objections to and motions concerning the filing of the accounting, and then, acting under the authority of KRS 25.180 and KRS 25.190, ordered the accounting referred, to A.”

United States v. Am. Cas. Co. of Reading, 238 F. Supp. 36 (W.D. Ky. 1964). “KRS 25.180 authorizes the county judge or special commissioner to hear evidence for or against any item and to question fiduciaries about any matter connected with the settlement and authorizes the summoning of witnesses at the instance of either party when settlement is made or…”

Hill v. Roberts, 311 S.W.2d 569 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958). “KRS 25.180 provides: “No credit shall be allowed a fiduciary for disbursements, fees or services without legal evidence to justify it.”

Combs v. Combs, 380 S.W.2d 227 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). “” KRS 25.180. “When a credit is claimed by a personal representative and its validity is disputed, the law casts on him the burden of supporting it; and in order to sustain such credit he must prove not only the payment, but also the existence, correctness, and validity of the…”

Rabold v. Roberts, 444 S.W.2d 536 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). “Before the final judgment in the circuit court, no such verified claim was filed and no order made by any court allowing Dora for extraordinary services. The commissioner in the county court even suggested that her claim for extraordinary services would be allowed if she would…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.