Kentucky Revised Statutes
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 26.530 (2026)
Repealed, 1978
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Catchline at repeal: Fines, forfeitures, jail taxes and costs recovered in police courts, how disposed of. History: Repealed 1976 (1st Extra. Sess.) Ky. Acts ch. 14, sec. 491, effective January 2, 1978. -- Amended 1966 Ky. Acts ch. 255, sec. 283. -- Amended 1964 Ky. Acts ch. 125, sec. 3. -- Amended 1954 Ky. Acts ch. 53, sec. 1. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 2917, 3155, 3162, 3360, 3368, 3515, 3516, 3517, 3526, 3642.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1948–1963 · leading case: City of Frankfort v. Triplett, 365 S.W.2d 328 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963).
City of Frankfort v. Triplett, 365 S.W.2d 328 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963). “(2) Whereas all fines, forfeitures and costs recovered in the police court had been collected by the city marshal, KRS 26.530 (3), they were now to be collected by the chief of police.”
City of Harlan v. Jones, 219 S.W.2d 37 (Ky. Ct. App. 1949). “However, we think this contention is not well taken because KRS 26.530(4), relating to fourth class cities specifically provides that all fees in the police court in other than civil cases shall be paid into the city treasury for use of the city.”
City of Morehead v. Commonwealth, 214 S.W.2d 610 (Ky. Ct. App. 1948). “The city contends it is entitled to the money under the terms of KRS 26.530(5), which provides: “All fines,forfeitures and costs recovered in any court, by prosecution originating in the police court of a city of the fifth- or sixth class, in the name of or in favor of the…”
City of Frankfort v. Jeffers, 223 S.W.2d 165 (Ky. Ct. App. 1949). “KRS 26.530, ss. 3, provides: “All fines, forfeitures and costs recovered in the police court or in any prosecution originating in the police court of any city of the third class shall be paid by the marshall into the city treasury.”
Commonwealth ex rel. City of Middlesboro v. Commonwealth, 298 S.W.2d 685 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957). “The appellee argues that as KRS 26.530(3) provides that all fines and forfeitures “in any prosecution originating in the police court of any city of the third class shall be paid by the marshal into the city treasury,” and that since this action did not originate in the police…”
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 26.530(2): 1 case
City of Frankfort v. Triplett, 365 S.W.2d 328 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963). “(2) Whereas all fines, forfeitures and costs recovered in the police court had been collected by the city marshal, KRS 26.530 (3), they were now to be collected by the chief of police.”
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 26.530(3): 1 case
Commonwealth ex rel. City of Middlesboro v. Commonwealth, 298 S.W.2d 685 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957). “The appellee argues that as KRS 26.530(3) provides that all fines and forfeitures “in any prosecution originating in the police court of any city of the third class shall be paid by the marshal into the city treasury,” and that since this action did not originate in the police…”
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 26.530(4): 1 case
City of Harlan v. Jones, 219 S.W.2d 37 (Ky. Ct. App. 1949). “However, we think this contention is not well taken because KRS 26.530(4), relating to fourth class cities specifically provides that all fees in the police court in other than civil cases shall be paid into the city treasury for use of the city.”
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 26.530(5): 1 case
City of Morehead v. Commonwealth, 214 S.W.2d 610 (Ky. Ct. App. 1948). “The city contends it is entitled to the money under the terms of KRS 26.530(5), which provides: “All fines,forfeitures and costs recovered in any court, by prosecution originating in the police court of a city of the fifth- or sixth class, in the name of or in favor of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.