Catchline at repeal: Reinstatement following administrative dissolution or revocation
under prior law -- Exception -- Amendment to extend or delete period of duration.
History: Repealed and reenacted 2010 Ky. Acts ch. 51, sec. 70, effective July 15, 2010;
amended ch. 133, sec. 9, effective July 15, 2010; and repealed ch. 151, sec. 151
effective January 1, 2011. -- Amended 2007 Ky. Acts ch. 62, sec. 1, effective July 1,
2008; and ch. 137, sec. 70, effective June 26, 2007. -- Amended 2005 Ky. Acts ch.
85, sec. 668, effective June 20, 2005. -- Amended 1992 Ky. Acts ch. 161, sec. 1,
effective April 1, 1992. -- Created 1988 Ky. Acts ch. 23, sec. 146, effective January
1, 1989.
Notes of Decisions
Fairbanks Arctic Blind Co. v. Prather & Assocs., Inc., 198 S.W.3d 143 (Ky. Ct. App. 2005).
· cites it 6× “In comparison, Kentucky’s reinstatement statute, KRS 271B.14-220(3), provides that [w]hen the reinstatement is effective, it shall relate back to and take effect as of the effective date of the administrative dissolution or revocation and the corporation shall resume carrying on…”
Pannell v. Shannon, 425 S.W.3d 58 (Ky. 2014).
· cites it 2× “After entry of the judgment, the shareholders had the corporation reinstated and moved to have the judgment set aside through the retroactive application of the reinstatement KRS 271B.14-220. Rather than applying laches or a similar theory, the Court of Appeals reasoned that the…”
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 271B.14-220(3): 2 cases
Fairbanks Arctic Blind Co. v. Prather & Assocs., Inc., 198 S.W.3d 143 (Ky. Ct. App. 2005).
“In comparison, Kentucky’s reinstatement statute, KRS 271B.14-220(3), provides that [w]hen the reinstatement is effective, it shall relate back to and take effect as of the effective date of the administrative dissolution or revocation and the corporation shall resume carrying on…”
Pannell v. Shannon, 425 S.W.3d 58 (Ky. 2014).
“After entry of the judgment, the shareholders had the corporation reinstated and moved to have the judgment set aside through the retroactive application of the reinstatement KRS 271B.14-220. Rather than applying laches or a similar theory, the Court of Appeals reasoned that the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.