Catchline at repeal: Appointment of stenographic reporters.
History: Repealed 1976 (1st Extra. Sess.) Ky. Acts ch. 14, sec. 491, effective January
2, 1978. -- Amended 1976 Ky. Acts ch. 62, sec. 40. -- Amended 1970 Ky. Acts ch.
142, sec. 1. -- Amended 1962 Ky. Acts ch. 260, sec. 1. -- Amended 1954 Ky. Acts
ch. 68, sec. 1. -- Amended 1950 Ky. Acts ch. 38, sec. 1. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts
ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 1019a-1, 4637, 4645a-
1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
8
cases, 1950–1974 · leading case:
Love v. Duncan, 256 S.W.2d 498 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953).
Love v. Duncan, 256 S.W.2d 498 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953).
· cites it 5× “’ “In the revision of the Statutes, however, the words ‘unless sooner removed at the pleasure of the judge of said court or division’ contained in Kentucky Statutes, Section 4637, were omitted and that section *502 was revised as KRS 28.410. Doubtless, this was unintentional on…”
Courier-Journal & Louisville Times Co. v. Curtis, 335 S.W.2d 934 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959).
· cites it 2× “Another reason why this statement of Owen should be considered a public record is that KRS 28.410 provides that each circuit judge may appoint an official reporter for his court.”
Bd. of Educ. of Graves Cnty. v. De Weese, 343 S.W.2d 598 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961).
· cites it 2× “2d 498, 501 , the official stenographic reporters of the Jefferson Circuit Court (then appointive to 4-year terms) were declared to be public officers subject to the limitation of §§ 161 and 235, with the result that in 1954 KRS 28.410 was amended to make reporters removable at…”
Louisville & N. R. v. Paul's Adm'r, 235 S.W.2d 787 (Ky. Ct. App. 1950).
“Appellee submits that the appellant may not escape the consequences, for its attorney delegated to the reporter the duty of preparing the bill and filing the same, and is bound by the reporter’s knowledge and act, which squares this case with the Helm case.”
Stacy v. Wagers, 264 S.W.2d 299 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953).
· cites it 4× ““The Law “KRS 28.410 clearly provides that each Circuit Judge may appoint an official stenographic reporter for his court or division, except that if his district embraces more than one county, none of which contains a city of the second class, he shall appoint one official…”
Louisville & N. R. v. Paul's Adm'r, 235 S.W.2d 787 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951).
“Appellee submits that the appellant may not escape the consequences, for its attorney delegated to the reporter the duty of preparing the bill and filing the same, and is bound by the reporter’s knowledge and act, which squares this ease with the Helm case.”
Curtis v. Van Arsdale, 277 S.W.2d 19 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955).
“the statute contemplates that the ultimate burden of furnishing transcripts to pauper appellants shall be borne by the county in the form of salary payments, the obligation of the county is to fix the annual salary of the reporter at a sum sufficient to include compensation for…”
Richardson v. Cannon, 506 S.W.2d 509 (Ky. Ct. App. 1974).
“Each judge has a reporter who receives $5,000 per year in salary from the Fiscal Court, KRS 28.410 and 28.450. For the foregoing reasons this case is remanded back to the circuit court for the entry of a judgment directing the reporter to furnish the transcript.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.