Kentucky Revised Statutes
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.675 (2026)
Repealed, 2015
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Catchline at repeal: Standards of certificate holder's rates and services. History: Repealed 2015 Ky. Acts ch. 19, sec. 45, effective June 24, 2015. -- Amended 1978 Ky. Acts ch. 232, sec. 10, effective June 17, 1978. -- Amended 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 269, sec. 2. -- Amended 1958 Ky. Acts ch. 130, sec. 13, effective July 1, 1958. -- Created 1950 Ky. Acts ch. 63, sec. 22, effective June 15, 1950.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1956–1966 · leading case: Coyle v. Dep't of Motor Transp., 298 S.W.2d 303 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956).
Coyle v. Dep't of Motor Transp., 298 S.W.2d 303 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). “For this reason alone it is urged that the issuance of the permit should be denied because this rate differential violates KRS 281.675(2). This statute reads: “Every contract made by a contract carrier for transportation service shall be just and reasonable, and shall be…”
Express v. Combs Motor Freight, Inc., 372 S.W.2d 807 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963). “Furthermore, the chief danger from such dual operations — that the holder of the two permits may undercut the competing common carriers by charging reduced rates for contract carriage' — -does not exist in Kentucky because our statute, KRS 281.675, requires contract carriers to…”
Hazard Express v. Dep't of Motor Transp., 320 S.W.2d 617 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959). “There *619 fore, we are asked to reverse the judgment on the ground that the rate differential violates KRS 281.675(2). This subsection of the statute provides: “Every contract made by a contract carrier for transportation service shall be just and reasonable, and shall be…”
Webb Transfer Line, Inc. v. Harris Trucking Co., 407 S.W.2d 707 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966). “The third contention of the appellant is that the rates proposed to be charged by Jones were not “comparable” to those of the common carriers, as is required by KRS 281.675(2). The record shows that the rate differential in truckload lots is not great; the big differential is in…”
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.675(2): 3 cases
Coyle v. Dep't of Motor Transp., 298 S.W.2d 303 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). “For this reason alone it is urged that the issuance of the permit should be denied because this rate differential violates KRS 281.675(2). This statute reads: “Every contract made by a contract carrier for transportation service shall be just and reasonable, and shall be…”
Hazard Express v. Dep't of Motor Transp., 320 S.W.2d 617 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959). “There *619 fore, we are asked to reverse the judgment on the ground that the rate differential violates KRS 281.675(2). This subsection of the statute provides: “Every contract made by a contract carrier for transportation service shall be just and reasonable, and shall be…”
Webb Transfer Line, Inc. v. Harris Trucking Co., 407 S.W.2d 707 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966). “The third contention of the appellant is that the rates proposed to be charged by Jones were not “comparable” to those of the common carriers, as is required by KRS 281.675(2). The record shows that the rate differential in truckload lots is not great; the big differential is in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.