Kentucky Revised Statutes
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 355.8-319 (2026)
Repealed, 1997
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Catchline at repeal: Statute of frauds. History: Repealed 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 130, sec. 182, effective January 1, 1997. -- Amended 1986 Ky. Acts ch. 118, sec. 43, effective July 1, 1987. -- Created 1958 Ky. Acts ch. 77, sec. 8-319, effective July 1, 1960.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1976–1995 · leading case: Smith v. Baker, 715 S.W.2d 890 (Ky. Ct. App. 1986).
Smith v. Baker, 715 S.W.2d 890 (Ky. Ct. App. 1986). “As there was no writing sufficient to meet the requirements of KRS 355.8-319, the alleged buy-sell agreement was unenforceable.”
Hogan v. Long, 922 S.W.2d 368 (Ky. 1995). “The Court of Appeals, in a unanimous opinion rendered May 27, 1988 (“1988 Opinion”), discussed KRS 355.8-319 and KRS 371.010(7) and the applicability of Smith v.”
Renfroe v. Ladd, 701 S.W.2d 148 (Ky. Ct. App. 1985). “Appellants raise the following issues on appeal: 1) whether the statute of frauds as set out in KRS 355.8-319 is applicable and, if so, is the defense of equitable estoppel available against it, and, 2) are there any genuine issues of fact concerning that issue and, if not, are…”
Shpilberg v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 535 S.W.2d 227 (Ky. 1976). “The circuit court held that under KRS 355.8-319 (a section of the Uniform Commercial Code) the confirmation slip, not objected to in writing within ten days, established the existence of a contract, which could not be contradicted by mere testimony that the parties never had…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.