Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 356
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 356.001 (2026)

Repealed, 1960

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Form of negotiable instrument. History: Repealed 1958 Ky. Acts ch. 77, Art. 10, sec. 10-102, effective July 1, 1960. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 3720b-1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1944–1951 · leading case: Bank of Marshall Cnty. v. Boyd, 215 S.W.2d 850 (Ky. Ct. App. 1948).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bank of Marshall Cnty. v. Boyd, 215 S.W.2d 850 (Ky. Ct. App. 1948). “But for the purpose of determining whether the transferee is a holder in due course, the negotiation takes effect as of the time when the endorsement is actually made.”
Denniston's Adm'r v. Jackson, 200 S.W.2d 477 (Ky. Ct. App. 1947). “The obscurity of the Negotiable Instruments Law, KRS 356.001 et seq., as to the liability of an intermediate endorser where the payee or other prior party has reacquired a note has provoked discussion among scholars in the law and given rise to diversity of opinions of the…”
Dobbs v. Holder, 242 S.W.2d 605 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951). “Nor did the Negotiable Instrument Act of 1904,-KRS 356.001 et seq., passed subsequently to the above quoted gambling statute modify in any respect the provisions of the latter.”
Aetna Oil Co. v. Glenn, 53 F. Supp. 961 (W.D. Ky. 1944). “475 ; compare Sections 3720b-1, 3720b-5, and 3720b-6, Carroll’s Kentucky Statutes, 1936 Edition; Sections 356.001, 356.005, 356.-006, Ky.Revised Statutes, 1942 Edition.”
Wilson v. Hillman, 208 S.W.2d 493 (Ky. Ct. App. 1948). · cites it 2× “Hillman” and thereby became a negotiable note under our negotiable instruments statute, which is Chapter 356, page 2694 of KRS, since it was payable to the order of the payee, which is expressly so provided by subsection (4) of section 356.001 of the same statute. The trustees…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.