Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 372
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 372.030 (2026)

Equitable relief against winner -- No penalty or forfeiture

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person entitled to recovery under KRS 372.020 may have discovery and relief in equity; but when such relief is obtained, the winner shall be discharged from all penalty and forfeiture for having won the money or other thing which, or the value of which, is so recovered back. Effective: October 1, 1942 History: Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 1957.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1947–2021 · leading case: Hope v. Burns, 6 F.R.D. 556 (E.D. Ky. 1947).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hope v. Burns, 6 F.R.D. 556 (E.D. Ky. 1947). · cites it 3× “KRS 372.030: “Any person entitled to recovery under KRS 372.”
Commonwealth of Kentucky Ex Rel. J. Michael Brown, Sec'y of the Governor's Exec. Cabinet v. Stars Interactive Holdings (Iom) Ltd., F/K/A Amaya Grp. Holdings (Iom) Ltd. (Ky. 2020). “” KRS 372.030. Under the provisions of KRS 372.”
Jan Maria Currin v. Mary R. Marcum as of the Est. of John C. Benton, Jr. (Ky. Ct. App. 2021). “ANALYSIS The Currins present the following assignments of error for our review: (1) the alleged oral agreement between John and the Currins is unenforceable per KRS 372.030(7) because it could not and/or was not intended to be performed within one year; (2) the Estate’s request…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 372.030(7) — 1 case
Jan Maria Currin v. Mary R. Marcum as of the Est. of John C. Benton, Jr. (Ky. Ct. App. 2021). “ANALYSIS The Currins present the following assignments of error for our review: (1) the alleged oral agreement between John and the Currins is unenforceable per KRS 372.030(7) because it could not and/or was not intended to be performed within one year; (2) the Estate’s request…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.